Author |
Message |
![Top of page](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/link-up.gif)
Joesbuell
| Posted on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 - 07:21 am: |
|
I have just bought a 2003 Sportster transmission with low miles for my Buell(98 S3) project. I have counted the teeth on some of the gears and there is a difference of one extra tooth on the newer trans. Can anyone enlighten me as to the pros/cons of this please. thanks Jodie |
![Top of page](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/link-up.gif)
Blake
| Posted on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 - 11:47 am: |
|
Which gear(s)? How many teeth? |
![Top of page](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/link-up.gif)
Matty
| Posted on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 - 11:49 am: |
|
I think it may be due to the change for second gear - that's my WAG anyway. In '99 or '00 the second gear ratio was changed from what was previously used. Other than that, I know of no other changes to the transmissions and they are the same for the XL and the Buell. |
![Top of page](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/link-up.gif)
Bluzm2
| Posted on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 - 10:56 pm: |
|
Matty, you are right. The later models have a slightly lower 2nd gear. I don't remember what year they changed though... Brad |
![Top of page](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/link-up.gif)
Joesbuell
| Posted on Thursday, November 02, 2006 - 07:00 am: |
|
thanks guys...I think they are all different except 5th. I may have miss counted them. I will count them again next time i'm in the shed. Jodie |
![Top of page](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/icons/link-up.gif)
Jackbequick
| Posted on Thursday, November 02, 2006 - 08:50 am: |
|
I think 2000 was the first year for the change on the second gear ratio, I remember seeing two ratios listed in the service manual for the 2000/2001 M2's and that my 2000 had the new ratio. It was a fairly minor change if I remember right but did make the steps in the ratios from 2nd to 5th a little more equal. Or something like that. Jack (Message edited by jackbequick on November 02, 2006) |
|