Author |
Message |
Thansesxb9rs
| Posted on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 - 09:59 pm: |
|
How many member are on the Bad Web now? |
Fullpower
| Posted on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 - 11:13 pm: |
|
another blake question: what is the chance that we might find more "space" for BIGGER IMAGE UPLOADS? more pixels=more fun |
Court
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 05:21 am: |
|
Blake is in Tahiti for a month working as a steward on the Carnival Cruise ship. No...he's just busy. Over 6,000 registered users from a gaggle of countries. Court |
Ingemar
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 06:18 am: |
|
What I find more interesting to know is how many concurrent users we have at average and peak. |
Loki
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 06:49 am: |
|
Now Court,I find that image of Blake extremely funny and unnerving at the same moment. |
Josh_
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 08:27 am: |
|
It's not the space, it's the processing power and bandwidth to send those larger images. |
Chainsaw
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 09:20 am: |
|
From engineer to Cabana Boy...is that a move up or down? if he's applying sunblock to bikini'd hotties, I'd call that a promotion |
Steveshakeshaft
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 09:45 am: |
|
Congratulations to all involved in BadWeb, making it THE premier information resource for Buell owners the world over! Regards Steve. |
Buelltroll
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 03:50 pm: |
|
Can one of you admins PUHLEEEEEEEZE un ban my IP I've been playing well with others for a while now. |
Blake
| Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 09:35 pm: |
|
Bigger pics... more bandwidth... it ain't free. From my experience, if one takes advantage of the www.xat.com image optimizer one can achieve excellent quality in images that darn near fill the screen in SVGA mode and still fall well below the 70 KB file size limit. Anything more than 700 pixels in width is overkill. You gotta remember that some, even many here are still using dial-up and a bunch of large pic files kills page download time. And again, it costs mucho bandwidth and bandwidth ain't free. |
Opto
| Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 05:03 am: |
|
Don't give an inch Blake, I'm still on dial-up. 70k is heaps. Do some people think they have to pay for the xat.com software? So bare with me Dean |
Shawn_9r
| Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 06:19 pm: |
|
Donnie... I agree you have been playing nice with others lately. |
99buellx1
| Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 06:39 pm: |
|
I dont find a problem with the pictures. This is 600 X 450 and is only 55.7K
|