The inherent fallacy of nuclear deterrence is known to anyone not blinded by Projection.
When, as Leftists and children do, you assume everyone else is just like you with the same motivations and lack of logic, you can't imagine anything else.
The idea of Mutually Assured Destruction was the sane leaders ( the ones that think like you ) wouldn't risk losing their positions of power by going to war. Or using WMDs.
But there are plenty of "bad guys" who don't care about Mean Twits or how you Feel about them, and it they think they can win, they go to war, and use ungentlemanly means.
Barack Hussein Obama took retaliation for using WMDs off the table, and drew imaginary "red lines" with only his humiliation as the result. The Syrian Dictator had no problems using poison gas on his rebellious subjects, and the world found The Light Bringer Barry wouldn't stop him.
Just like Barry treated ISIS better than our allies. But that's what lying sacks, do.
Not only was Barry's Deal with Iran fake, his minions admitted the stupid press believed any lie they fed them.
Barry supported the women raping Muslim Brotherhood, and the Women murdering Mullahs, and his former crew continues to prop up the terrorists in Tehran.
Barry's policy increased terrorism, murder, rape, and a massive flood of refugees. I don't see any difference in Joe's*.
It's Treason , Corruption, and Lies, end to end, deliberately, with malice aforethought.
It wasn’t a mistake. It has been their plan all along.
The left doesn’t care about russian or chinese emissions. It’s the American economy they’re trying to destroy. Smash the system, build back better. Better means communism. Russia and china are already communist, so there’s no work for the left to do in those places.
Why try for Impeachment? It won't happen. The Republicans are not going to gain the seats needed in the Senate to convict. The thought that at least Biden would be exposed is not enough in my opinion. The left would say it's lies, the media would back them up, and too few people would awaken to the truth. It would be a time and money wasting side show. It would be seen as vindictive. Something the Democrats do. The Republicans should do better.
Yes, I can. But I study species ending planetary disasters like Comet strikes. Harris* is at best #5 behind super volcanoes, & the upcoming Ice Age. But she might cause Global Thermonuclear War.
My pronouns today are Counterrevolutionary, & Unrepentant.
At least a nuclear war will be a fast death for most of the population here in the U.S.A.
It's those left behind that are most screwed. I live outside the blast radius of three possible targets. Right about in the middle of the three in terms of mileage, at approximately 150mi. So while I am likely to survive the initial attack, radiation and panic amongst those not vaporized will be my probable undoing.