| Author | Message | ||
     Aesquire |
 First off, the REASON men sit legs open is biological. We have testicles. They require cooling to prevent sterility, foul odors, and discomfort. Women sit the same way to cool off their lovely parts too. I will grant that Victorian sex obsessed nutjobs may have imposed cultural pressure on women to sit "demurely" with their legs closed, presumably to reduce temptation for the men? like concealing clothing? or just that the Virgin Queen felt too "dirty" letting her clam dry out after lusting after the stableboy. I have no Idea, and don't blame me for that psychosis. There's more than one reason we left the Empire. Also, if you've read Huckleberry Finn, there's a great part about pretending to be a woman, and it touches on the subject. America's Greatest Writer is the most banned in Uptight circles for a reason. They fear truth and have serious sex hangups... Like this "inventor". My advice to her is to find a guy, or gal, I don't care, who is a considerate lover and doesn't treat her like crap. Think back to the ones you Friendzoned in favor of the "dangerous" hot one that hurt you so badly. All men aren't inconsiderate monsters. You just suck at picking them. | ||
| Ratbuell |
"Infringing on her public space"? "Her" and "public" are at odds there. "Her" space, fine. I wont sit in her lap, nor in the same chair as her. PUBLIC space, however...kiss mine. George Carlin summed it up: "don't like what you hear on the radio? It has 2 knobs on it. One changes the channel and one turns it off." Don't like what you see? Look the other way like I do every time I see 400# wrapped in 15 yards of spandex. It's PUBLIC. You do what you want, and let me do what I want. You dont want to be offended. I get that. None of us do. But at what point does you not being offended take precedence over my not wanting to have the boys in a vise? I'm not waving them around so they can get a tan...you just need to grow up and look the other way. Unless, like Victorian prudes, you really WANT to look and are too immature to curb the temptation...but, thats not my problem either. | ||
| Bandm |
https://fox8.com/2019/07/21/naked-man-walks-into-v ermont-store-buys-coffee/ | ||
| Aesquire |
Ratbuell, while they may be driven by sexual repression, it's not the sight of the crotch of your blue jeans that offends them. It's the space you take up. Apparently some "males" sit spread legged on the train & ? I haven't figured out if the offended are too shy to tell them to scoot over and make room, or if the males are just rude & refused, or what. I could comprehend rude jerks on a train, or being fed up with rude feminists & not offering gentlemanly courtesy in response. More likely the former. I'm an old school supporter of real feminism. Equal rights, equal pay, equal opportunity. Heck, I've fought dress codes & cheered the "top free 7" who went topless in the park in Rochester to protest the unfair laws that allowed guys to remove their shirts, but not gals. It's now legal for both sexes in NY. I admit the 7 were not my favorite body type to see topless, but that's true of lots of guys, including myself. But you have to accept that if you want to enjoy the more aesthetically pleasing, and taste is taste. Oh, and it's only fair. ( almost forgot ) So... long time supporter of women's rights, equal rights for everyone... Didn't see coming, guys claiming to be girls taking medals and ruining scholarships for girl athletes though. And the balkanization of sex really annoys me. Although I now know about many more people who I don't want to have sex with, so there's that. Not a fair trade, they weren't going to have sex with me anyway, so all I gained is more depression.  & I've been through the "it isn't fair that the male word in English, "man" stands for men & women". Yep. Unfair. Don't care. Care even less about eliminating "gender nouns" like manhole cover etc. Bite my shiny metal...... | ||
| Hootowl |
Man spreading isn’t about nuts, it’s about how our legs attach to our hips. Simple geometry. | ||
| Ratbuell |
So... long time supporter of women's rights, equal rights for everyone... Agreed. Although I was raised to understand it all fell under the term "manners". I more prefer not to see gender as a decision-making device, one way or the other. PERSON. Period. Not that I agree with the concept that sex is more than binary - physically, genetically, you're either one...or you're the other. Period. But I don't think a man or a woman should be afforded any more or any less manners than anyone else. And that's part of my problem with quotas - they use their specific metric (gender, race, take your pick) to try and promote some sort of agenda. Sorry. Everyone gets the same consideration. Those who can do a job, GET the job. If you can't do the job...you don't get a pass based on your skin tone, nor on your equipment. Study. Work harder. THEN maybe you'll get the job. I will admit that I didn't think of the mass-transit seating thing. The combination of freestanding chairs in the photo, and the simple fact that I live in an area (rural) that doesn't have much (if any) mass transit...it simply didn't occur to me. But again - it doesn't come down to gender. It comes down to MANNERS. | ||
| Aesquire |
I agree. I only know about the mass transit aspect, heck, the very word manspreading, by memes posted internationally. It's snowflake artificial oppression. I stand ready to support any cause that makes sense for...better manners. Freedom. But the fact that English has sex specific words? It's just that way. Go use a language that doesn't. They exist. Berkley just banned words with "gender bias???" aka words with "man" in them, like manhole etc. Bite me. Orwellian satanic crap. Control the language, control the thoughts. I'm not playing. And I hold doors for women. And men with burdens. And men. And people, dogs, & cats. I've been cursed. Bite me. Your rudeness doesn't mean I can't be courteous. And I not only know what courteous means, I know what chivalry means, and can give a history of the roots of both. Courteous.. Courtly.. Court manners.. Suitable behavior in the company of your peers, and Royalty. Chivalry, (french) horsemanship.. Skills of a mounted warrior.. Warrior skills & responsibility to the innocent.. Kindness to others...basically, The quote associated with Spider-Man by Stan Lee... Chivalry means having a plan to kill everyone in the room, having the skills to do so, knowing that having such power means being responsible in it's use, knowing the obligation to use your skills to protect those who cannot, and Courtesy! which, incidentally, really helps to get laid. See also. Courtly love. Noblese Oblige. Common courtesy. Warrior code. I fall short of these ideals, but I have them, and know where they come from. | ||
| Aesquire |
https://www.warriorcode.us Of course, when I search for Warrior Code, I get merchandise. God bless America. | ||
| Aesquire |
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/07/hon g-kong-caracas-and-portland.php | ||
| Aesquire |
https://safehaven.com/article/3984/totally-out-of- touch-with-reality Found while researching this author. Some things never change. "We'll borrow the money" ( to pay for hurricane relief ) and a supposedly fiscally conservative President that never vetoed a spending bill & let the debt double over his term . You remember, Hitler. ( at least that's what the Democrats called him while he gave them every penny of borrowed money they asked for ) You might also remember his successor, who accused him of reckless over spending & promised to cut the debt... Then doubled it again in half the time. Or that guy's successor, who also gave the Democrats all the borrowed money they asked for, as they named HIM Hitler. Why do I feel like I'm stuck in Punxsutawny? Am I the only person with a functional memory? Or am I still in a horrifying hallucination from that acid that was going around my sophomore year? | ||
| Ratbuell |
Never having touched anything stronger than a nice, aged single malt...I can safely say it isn't the acid. I'm sorry. | ||
| Crusty |
Why do you think we had a Depression in 2008? | ||
| Aesquire |
I assumed it was the money bribed to Congress to allow sub prime mortgages sold by their patrons to be bundled & sold as bonds. Corruption and fraud. And bailouts with your money to patrons that bribed Congress. Speaking of corruption and bribery. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/07/m ueller_and_comey_a_cozy_relationship.html | ||
| Ebutch |
 | ||
| Aesquire |
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-23/epstein- case-rare-opportunity-focus-depraved-nature-americ as-elite https://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2019/07/our- ruling-elites-have-no-idea-how-much.html Our Ruling Elites have no idea how many of us already want to see them all in prison jumpsuits, and they also have no idea how fast the moral revulsion with their corrupt "leadership" might spread. Scanning the distracted, consumerist rabble from the great heights of their wealth and power, they reckon the capacity for moral outrage is limited, leaving them safe from any domestic crusade. They also trust that the citizenry can be further fragmented, further distracted, and so they will continue to be invulnerable. Or worst case scenario, a few especially venal villains will need to be sacrificed, and then all will return to the bliss of Neofeudal exploitation. But they may have misread the American citizenry, just as they've misread history. | ||
| Sifo |
It's simply not healthy to have dirt on the Clintons!!! Jeffrey Epstein Found Injured in NYC Jail Cell After Possible Suicide Attempt: Sources | ||
| Ratbuell |
Be interesting to see if he has anything to say about the event. He's "marked" anyway...might as well put some sunshine on the cockroaches on his way out. | ||
| Aesquire |
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/07/t he_anticultural_nihilism_of_the_left.html Arkanside. Suicide by being a threat to the Clinton crime family. A new word, let's see if it gets in a dictionary. | ||
| Whisperstealth |
Most Arkansans in my part of the state strongly dislike the Clintons. In fact most of Arkansas, aside from Little Rock is solidly Republican Red. The Clintons abandoned Arkansas a long time ago, they now belong to the NYC Elitist Scumbag Club. | ||
| Torquehd |
| ||
| Ebutch |
ilhan  | ||
| Aesquire |
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/07/raw_r acism_bette_midler_calls_black_people_at_trump_ral ly_blackground_and_asks_what_they_were_paid.html I have no idea how this editorial writer thinks the Democrat Party is, and encouraged others to be, racist. It couldn't be the Klu Klux Klan, Jim Crow, Just Joe Biden's astonishment at a black man who is clean, well groomed, and can speak understandable english, or the assumption that black Americans want to stay on the vote Plantation of Welfare, or calling intelligent black people, or blacks that work hard in school, Uncle Toms... Or could it? Bette needs to be heard. They should raise money to make these attitudes widely known. | ||
| Hootowl |
No surprise there. | ||
| Torquehd |
I'm still waiting for the left to embrace the idea that it's wrong to discriminate against adults who love children. Just because Epstien, Clinton, and a host of others had perfectly natural and normal feelings of love for prepubescent girls (and boys?) doesn't mean it's wrong so long as the children consent. You think I'm joking. Stop being so racist with all your pedophobia, you priveleged white nazi. I'm waiting for "pedophobia" to become a new key word. It'll be right up there with Arkanside. Edit. I've been thinking about this backwards. It will start with, "she truly loved me". Why shouldn't a minor be able to love whoever she/he wants? To deny a human of their natural impulses is wrong, no matter the age. It doesn't matter if you're 18 or 81 or 8. If you think it's wrong you're pedophobic. It will be a childrens liberation movement. Wait for it.... (Message edited by torquehd on July 26, 2019) | ||
| Aesquire |
https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/andy-ngo I have a relative who has been watching Infowars and other sites I consider "sensationalist". Not saying they are evil deliberate lying monsters that would murder you with glee, like CNN, or Jeff Bezos, but folk that hype the story, often out or proportion. One sided black & white stories that have shades of grey and are being spun, hard. ( am I allowed to say B & W? Heck yes. Political correctness is evil ) So, a year ago he started raving about pedophiles in govt. & hollywood. Big cover up, nasty stuff going on. I was more than skeptical. But lately, I had to apologize to him. The only thing I'm uncertain about is the Pizza parlor Dungeon, I rate that as probable, but have seen no evidence. I bet that "pedophobe" isn't the word they are going to use, but I think you have it basically correct. I'm not going to waste time coming up with a "better" word to use to defend the indefensible. There's a nasty part of my psyche that is not looking forward to the results of the first person that calls me that to my face. But I agree that it's coming to a school near you. | ||
| Hootowl |
Hey, if we let 5 year olds decide to ‘change’ their gender, why not let them choose to have sex with 70 year olds? It’ll likely have fewer long term consequences than the hormones they’re taking. Dripping with sarcasm. I figured I say so outright. Tough to tell these days. | ||
| Aesquire |
Expect that Bill to pass the House before October. (Sarcasm but partly fear of it happening ) On the one hand, the old fartz crowd have been pushing for drinking and smoking to be raised to over 21. I have a rant on this, but it's essentially jealousy and wanting to keep the bar the old guys took over when they were 20. "I can't hear myself drink over this noise". On the other hand, the weirdo lobby has created new sex related "rights" with no age limits. Exploiting suggestive lonely kids. Even schools giving hormones to children against the expressed wishes of the parent. Another case of incredibly difficult to determine maturity on an individual basis, And fitness to be a parent, and cause for murder, suicide, and mass shootings. ( the least discussed cause of school age mass murder is sexual frustration and cruelty ) In my not at all humble opinion, giving a nine year old hormones to stunt sexual growth is child abuse, although I admit that at some age the child can make an Informed choice as to sexual preference, but that's a very individual thing, nigh impossible to put a number on that applies to everyone. Hating the body you were born with, or being influenced by fringe advocates? Deciding you want to change your body drastically and permanently? Hard to believe a kid of, say, eight, can make an informed decision. Life is intense & very b&w at that age and peer pressure literally lethal. Incredible cruelty with no concept of consequences, is all too common in children. That intensity and desperation is Easy to exploit by evil adult perverts. I'm not in a vacuum here, I have a relative going through the perceived need to change sexes, and medicine can not do that yet. But it can mutilate and provide hormone "therapy", that I have observed in friend's relationships to be volatile and destructive. No easy answers. Serious issues with children's rights and protection. The deeper you dig, the angrier you get, and the less clear the subject is to the public. One of my biggest questions is who is sincerely concerned with helping children, and who is an exploitive monster? If that answer was easy, so would be the solution. | ||
| Aesquire |
Incredible cruelty with no concept of consequences, is all too common in children. And folk like Antifa, or the SPLC, fit that mold as well. Childish emotions in adult bodies, and exploited by very evil people. Using the immature minds as cannon fodder isn't happening, again, by chance. | ||
| Torquehd |
I identify as an Stealth Attack Helicopter, but no medicine can do that yet. Maybe some day they'll be able to download my consciousness onto a hard drive like in the Netflix show Altered Carbon. Maybe somewhere between that and self driving, flying cars, I can finally become a self-realized RAH-66 Comanche. If that sounds ridiculous, I believe modern science is closer to making that happen than to being able to change a person's gender. Yes the CRISPR has been able to delete certain DNA strands but I haven't seen any sex changes yet. Though that may be around the corner, who knows. Scientists have been playing with neural interfaces and hard drives for, not sure how long, but at a minimum Elon is developing it, and DARPA has been using hard drives to increase memory in human beings. I don't expect either transition will happen. But if it does, I want to be  | ||
| Hootowl |
Nice ass. You have chosen wisely.  And you’re obviously not a racist. |
