The Obama administration issued a request for proposal ( aka they will issue contracts to those asking for them ) to transport thousands of children to selected American cities over the next year after the RFP. Specifically, towns and small cities in "red states".
Then ( pay attention to cause & effect ) Obama gave a speech saying he would not enforce immigration law against children as part of his DREAMER executive order. Inviting a wave of children to be abandoned into his care from/through Mexico.
I dare you to look the above up.
Further results of the Obama policy to separate children from their parents include a wave of MS-13 hang members claiming to be minors getting free bus & van rides to join their gangs across the country. Supported by Nancy Pelosi as bearing the spark of divinity. ( I assume Nancy's Catholic upbringing informed her language. Unusual for a Party that pretends to a Nietzche Nihilism that God is dead. Apparently only murderous gang members qualify now as divine. )
Specifically the ongoing policy of the Democrat Party leaders to take their own crimes ( example racism ) and accuse the enemy ( republicans ) of that crime in an effort to tar the enemy as hateful, and cover up the actual crimes by transference of guilt.
Note that this policy is so widespread and so often repeated that you can get rich by betting that any given accusations are in fact, by the actual guilty parties.
That is, if you could get anyone foolish enough to bet, AND honest enough to pay off. A combination not typical of leftists.
From the incorruptible to an organization you'd be a fool to trust.
There's a great commercial by 2 CA lawyers advertising for clients that repeatedly gives the advice, in long form, stfu. They address illegal pot dispensaries employees.
Shady characters? OK, but if you don't follow that advice with the FBI you are an idiot. The Witch Hunt team sent a retired General to prison for lying even though the agents who interviewed him said he was telling the truth.
And knowing that Federal Law Enforcement Agencies will lie to send you to jail pretty much transforms respect into contempt.
From the American Thinker, Thomas Lifson-penned editorial linked above:
quote:
The best explanation of the hypocrisy of the Democrat sanctuary city advocates that I have seen was offered by Tucker Carlson on his eponymous show Friday. If you've not seen it, the nine-minute video is well worth your time:
The Democrats have nothing substantive to offer in rebuttal, and so resort to empty rhetoric about “hate” and ”pawns.”
Trump knows that if he is able to follow through and apply a little Cloward-Piven love [see also excerpt and link below - FB] to his enemies, they will have to cave.
quote:
Barack 0bama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis By James Simpson ~ September 28, 2008
[snip]
The Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis
In an earlier post, I noted the liberal record of unmitigated legislative disasters, the latest of which is now being played out in the financial markets before our eyes. Before the 1994 Republican takeover, Democrats had sixty years of virtually unbroken power in Congress - with substantial majorities most of the time. Can a group of smart people, studying issue after issue for years on end, with virtually unlimited resources at their command, not come up with a single policy that works? Why are they chronically incapable?
Why?
One of two things must be true. Either the Democrats are unfathomable idiots, who ignorantly pursue ever more destructive policies despite decades of contrary evidence, or they understand the consequences of their actions and relentlessly carry on anyway because they somehow benefit.
I submit to you they understand the consequences. For many it is simply a practical matter of eliciting votes from a targeted constituency at taxpayer expense; we lose a little, they gain a lot, and the politician keeps his job. But for others, the goal is more malevolent - the failure is deliberate. Don't laugh. This method not only has its proponents, it has a name: the Cloward-Piven Strategy. It describes their agenda, tactics, and long-term strategy.
The Russians hated Hillary, ( article explains ) and Just Joe, because of his Ukraine corruption. They didn't like or want Trump, either. But Comrade Bernie? Him they loved! He was theirs. Bernie would never confront or thwart his Comrades.
Now, I doubt there was any coordination between Bernie and Putin, not like Obama's. Putin just ordered the spying and leaks. Much easier than depending on a Useful Idiot to follow a script.
The Civil Liberties Act was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan which granted each surviving member of a Japanese internment camp about US$20,000 in compensation (or, $40,000 after inflation-adjustment in 2016 dollars), with payments beginning in 1990. The legislation stated that government actions were based on "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership" as opposed to legitimate security reasons.
But have you ever noticed they never talk about what‘s causing people to flee their homes in the first place?
Um...how about the fact that lefty Dems give them all sorts of free shit, with zero consequences or requirements that they need to do to qualify/repay? Like, oh, I don't know...CITIZENSHIP and TAXES?
I’ m sure the business owners won’t mind the occasional $749 theft while they pay a livable minimum wage to restock the shelves with new stuff to steal.
So who decides it's a "necessity"? Hell, I can afford a pizza for dinner...but that doesn't mean I *want* to pay for it. Why can't I steal food and get away with it? It's for personal consumption, after all...and I have to eat...so why shouldn't I help myself? Why stop at a sandwich or a pizza - how about a six pack? Or a whole cart of food? Clothes? Prescription eyewear? All of those are "necessary"....right? I'm sure someone will decide they all fall under "human rights"...
But, the Dems are absolutely, positively, indubitably NOT against the rule of law. That's all the President's fault. HE's the one destroying America.
Roberts pressed the District Attorney on whether or not the policy would lead to an increase in crime.
“I don’t think there’s any evidence that shows that,” said Creuzot. “There’s not any research that shows that the type of individuals we’re talking about will lead to an increase in crime.”
The D.A. told Roberts his office would track theft statistics in coming months to see how effective his policy is.
“Our policies are based on research, not personal preference,” Creuzot said.
And no doubt their "research" will show that they prosecute less crimes for theft below $750. So do you have to prove that you can't afford to buy food? Seems that would be quite prejudicial. Sounds like open season on pilfering "necessities".
That casually refers to Trump's racial remarks. I am sincerely at a loss as to what he means. The Dems went wild about the remarks after Charlottesville, regarding blocking immigration from certain Moslem majority countries, the sh!thole countries remark, and the border enforcement. Each of those were either taken out of context, the truth, carrying on Obama policies, or, worst of all, carrying out the law.