So, now that the governor of VA is in big hot water and it looks like he may step down, the LT Governor of VA is being accused of sexually assaulting a woman at the 2004 DNC.
So, now the lieutenant governor of Virginia is accusing the governor, who is under extreme heat for the KKK/blackface yearbook photo, of leaking the sexual assault allegations about the lieutenant governor to the media to ensure that the governor can't be replaced by the lieutenant governor.
You couldn't make this up.
Oh yea, the Washington Post, which published all sorts of uncorroborated crap about Kavanaugh, said "yea, we knew about this two years ago but there were some red flags so we didn't print it".
the Washington Post, which published all sorts of uncorroborated crap about Kavanaugh, said "yea, we knew about this two years ago but there were some red flags so we didn't print it".
While not surprising at all, this pisses me off. It is quite certain he would have lost the election if this came out during the election so they obviously protected a candidate that they sided with. And they wonder why no one trusts or believes anything they write anymore.
My opponent is Racist! His followers are racist! Republicans are racist! Trump is racist!
And he hides that his running mate is black on hand outs in "certain areas".
And apparently is.... Classically Southern Democrat Racist, one of. Not an actual Klan member, too young. But I'll bet there was a wistful comment over a few too many beers that he missed out on the good old days of cross burning.
Then again, I could be wrong. He could be a racially blind guy, ( the Republican Ideal ) who just had a savvy campaign staff that knows Virginia Democrats, and played to their prejudices while blaming Republicans for them.
Oh, and utter, sociopathic ruthlessness, with contempt for honesty.
And you can't help but wonder if his mistaken moment of honesty about killing babies after they are born is the real reason for the yearbook reveal. The Planned Parenthood genocidal movement really doesn't want people to pay attention that new laws make abortion not just for the unborn, any more. And you can bet that there is no age or time limit to killing people in the new "women's health protections". Five minutes after birth? Five days? When mom decides it's too stressful to have a child after three nights of colic & a garbage can to stuffed with used diapers to lift?
And I did notice that "fathers" don't exist in these laws. As though they were carefully targeted at select ethnic groups.
Hey, I'm pro choice and this stuff terrifies me. As a history buff, I see a repeat of 1930s nihilism. And a few of you might know what that led to.
And you can't help but wonder if his mistaken moment of honesty about killing babies after they are born is the real reason for the yearbook reveal. The Planned Parenthood genocidal movement really doesn't want people to pay attention that new laws make abortion not just for the unborn, any more.
I've seen a couple of suggestions of just that on Twitter. Note that he also committed the cardinal sin of referring to the "tissue mass" as a "baby". Can't have that.
And watching some of the discussions of the topic on the MSM, there was one where one of the panel members (obviously "the" conservative voice) brought up the abortion thing and a) the host shook her head and stared at the desk while they spoke; b) the other panel members started jabbering about "this isn't that, let's stay on topic here, you just want to argue about that because there's no argument about racism", etc.
Attempts to talk about late-term abortion, and his comments that "the child will be kept comfortable while the doctor and mother have a discussion", are strictly forbidden, it would appear. Ignore the elephant in the room, we have a nice little fieldmouse over here to talk about instead...
Posted on Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - 10:14 pm:
Maybe cotton-mouth IDK.
Too much legal pot, I suppose...
Looking at her asymmetric features, lost words, erratic movements...I seriously think she's already stroked. Minor, she still functions (ish), but the symptoms are there.
Judge Sandra Ikuta agreed, stating she was concerned customers would see the women working as saying: “I am sexually available,” the Herald Net reported.
Well, duh. How do you think they earn their tips?? Her Honor must have never worked in a service industry before. Ever. I don't know a single waiter or waitress who doesn't pull their wedding band off before a shift - not to flirt, not to cheat, but to help customers think "hm...maybe...".
As for measuring...well...if you can swipe a credit card through the cleft it's probably too exposed