| Author | Message | ||
     Misato |
well the a/f is wayy better but $160 and I got 2hp 78.9 was max. I'll post the charts later hmm still 10 away from the magic force charts putting all that crap aside, it runs good and I guess thats what matters. so it must make aboout 68hp stock? | ||
| Timbo |
Hey Tim, If it makes you feel any better, my 9R w/factory race kit (filter,ecm,can) had a best run of 74.4. That was about six months ago. That being said, I just had one of the best weekends ever on a bike. Torching and scorching some of the best twisties California has to offer, with some of the best riders around, including Ferris, Dino, Jim SB and Kidcoocoo (who is not on this board). From Santa Barbara to the Southern Sierras to Yosemite Valley it was truly awesome, but what I'm getting at is that we had a good assortment of bikes, and never once did I feel underpowered or lacking in any way. In fact the XB was very at home and perfomed as well as I could ever ask. Could I have used more power? Maybe. Did I ever think 'I wish I had more power'? Nope, not once. Take it FWIW. Timbo | ||
| Misato |
yeah, it runs great.. I do like it, I'm just wondering about all the HAPPY dynos around here  | ||
| Glitch |
Did you have nice sticky tires on? Was the bike nice and warmed up. Was it warm and humid? Cold and dry? Was this the same dyno that ate your tire last time? EDIT: Does anyone know what the corrected HP of the graph be? So much can affect a dyno. edited by glitch on May 06, 2004 | ||
| Misato |
 | ||
| Misato |
this is a dynojet 250, but a different one that ate my tire, bike was good and warm. it shows the temp and stuff on there, the first run is within 2hp of what the run was on the other dyno so I'm thinking its pretty accurate | ||
| Noface |
I've only had my 9R on the dyno once. It's an old thing at Bozwells HD in Nashville. My run was 73.4hp. 9r with race ECM, D&D, and K&N filter. So I guess we're all about in the same ballpark. And I do agree on the "happy" dyno thing... | ||
| Misato |
and for those who dont know.. 9S Force pipe w/baffle PCIII-mapped HiPo O2 | ||
| Chainsaw |
My stock 9 dynod by Aaron Wilson was 76hp. Blue one's are faster!  | ||
| Court |
>>>My stock 9 dynod by Aaron Wilson was 76hp. Chainsaw....you feel compelled to resort to hard substantiated facts and objective data I will have you fined.  | ||
| Pilk |
Yeah what Court said, btw Aaron told me that the race stripes on my X-1 were worth 5mph on the salt. I believe him. To bad it rained....or I would have proved the statement. Pilk | ||
| Chainsaw |
Stock XB Dynos | ||
| Misato |
and if my 78.9 was dyno'd on aarons it would probably read ~88 and if I dyno'd a stock 9 on the same dyno up here it would say mid 60's I've had it on 2 different dynos both say the same thing 76-78 big difference from 78 to 89 either way it runs great and I like it... I'm just saying there is a 10hp difference in dyno readings up here and down there I might pay them to run a stock one just for the hell of it. I still say it will come up around 66 | ||
| Prof_stack |
Misato: $20 per dyno run this coming Saturday at Downtown Harley. More data to come? | ||
| Wyckedflesh |
Misato, your Dyno runs are UNCORRECTED. See if they can give you the CORRECTED numbers. You might be suprised at what you find out. | ||
| M1combat |
I believe you loose ~3%/1K' in power... What elevation were the dyno's performed at? | ||
| Misato |
around 250ft hey prof, I'll pay for yours!! 8o) | ||
| Wyckedflesh |
There is more then just altitude when being corrected. Barometric pressure and such as well. | ||
| Misato |
my first dyno from a few months ago said SAE on it. isn't that corrected? | ||
| Wyckedflesh |
SAE is but if you look at what you posted in the upper corner it says "UNCORRECTED" which isn't SAE. So your comparing apples to oranges and don't have an accurate comparison. | ||
| Misato |
the one above is 'un'. I had it done 3 weeks ago, SAE, and it said ~76. so I had it dyno tuned (the one thats posted above-uncorrected) and the baseline was 77, then after a custom map it was 78.9. so, SAE=76=uncorrected=77 this one the bike has no changes to the first run above. this is getting complicated. my point is 'sae' and 'un' look like ~2hp  edited by misato on May 10, 2004 | ||
| Chainsaw |
Misato: Mine was dynoed at around 6,000 feet. I believe I am significantly farther uphill than you. |
