Author |
Message |
Vsingle
| Posted on Monday, July 13, 2015 - 07:39 pm: |
|
In my 2001 service manual, maintenance section 1.9, it clearly states: rotate adjustment screw counterclockwise until it lightly bottoms. The diagram appears to indicate the primary chain adjustment screw as "the adjustment screw". So I followed the directions, and as I suspected, the bolt does not "lightly bottom". Rather, it falls on the ground and then all of the primary lube chases after it. Do they mean counterclockwise as viewed from the top of the bike looking down? If so, then the bolt would indeed "lightly bottom" as the primary chain gets tightened up. Perhaps I have the Australian version of the service manual? Maybe Down under clockwise and counterclockwise are reversed? I would appreciate any clarification on this topic. |
Gearheaderiko
| Posted on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - 05:36 am: |
|
Screw the adjuster bolt in, that's the only way it will lightly bottom. However, it seems as if you are confusing the clutch adjustment procedure with the primary chain adjustment procedure. |
Gearheaderiko
| Posted on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - 05:39 am: |
|
PS Oftentimes the picture you are supposed to be looking at is on a different page than the one you are reading. Buells/Harley's are not complicated, but the factory repair manuals are!!! |
Vsingle
| Posted on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - 08:02 am: |
|
The manual I have is wrong. It clearly states what picture to refer to, and the picture shows the primary tensioner bolt. |
Buellistic
| Posted on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - 08:37 am: |
|
CLUTCH ADJUSTMENT Class 101, just PM me for a copy ... |
Gearheaderiko
| Posted on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - 10:14 am: |
|
Well, the manual may or may not be wrong, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was wrong. It is an unnecessarily confusing set-up, but my manual is packed right now so I can't check it to see what's what. |
Vsingle
| Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2015 - 01:18 pm: |
|
http://www.craigerson.com/buell-blast-service-manu al/ |
Ezblast
| Posted on Friday, July 17, 2015 - 04:19 am: |
|
Schmuck - lol - use the manuals here - http://buellridersonline.com/forum/showthread.php? t=6800&highlight=Manuals EZ |
Vsingle
| Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2015 - 07:24 am: |
|
"Not Found" |
Ezblast
| Posted on Sunday, July 19, 2015 - 01:51 am: |
|
LOL - your computer has issues - it opens for me. Go to buellridersonline.com - copy and paste - join - then go to the search bar and type in Blast manuals - it is the stickey post in the 1st page of listed options, lol - or go here - http://buellmods.com/ - it doesn't have all the Buell manuals yet, it will soon though, but it has most of the Blast and a newer parts manual. EZ |
Vsingle
| Posted on Sunday, July 19, 2015 - 10:59 am: |
|
Thank you for providing the buellmods link. The intent of this original post was to contribute some small bit of information to the knowledge vault that the 2001 service manual has an error in the clutch adjustment section. The link you provided does not have a 2001 manual, though it does have 2002 thru 2007. I downloaded and checked each one. They all contain the same error: the text is correct, but the bolt (6) referenced in the sketches is not the clutch adjustment screw, it is the primary chain tension adjustment screw. For schmucks like me who actually read manuals and follow directions, it might be handy to know that the manual is incorrect. Just sayin' |
Ezblast
| Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2015 - 11:35 pm: |
|
LOL - it's just so hard for me cause I try to give the factory manual away in so many different ways - there is even a section here in the kv where you list where the manual is incorrect.http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/messages/201 64/452353.html?1317048345 That you used a non- factory manual just weirds me out - I'm not down on you - just suprised - I give it away in my group, the other Blast group gives it away, buellridersonline gives it away and buellmods gives it away. Sigh.... EZ |
Vsingle
| Posted on Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - 12:49 pm: |
|
Non-factory manual? The link I referenced was indeed a 2001 factory manual. What boggles my mind is that I ask for clarification and no one seems to be able to look at their own copy of the manual (from whatever source) and either say yep, good catch, or dude you are effed up. |
Ezblast
| Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2015 - 03:47 am: |
|
I gave you the link - if you want to post the inconsistency - post it there. It is a good catch. Just chill and relax. EZ |
Gearheaderiko
| Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2015 - 07:40 am: |
|
Concur. I don't think this is the first time this has come up. I've looked up and rewrote sections and procedures for many people over the years because: a) they didn't have manual b)they didn't understand the manual c) the manual was wrong d) they couldn't get to the manual. I clarified that you were doing the wrong procedure or were doing the procedure wrong. You could've just taken pictures of the pages and posted them here. Having had to move TWICE in less than 9 months, my manual is packed away, AGAIN. Forgive me if I don't dig it out, asap. To imply that we're not helpful, especially when we have been, is ludicrous and insulting. It takes an incredible amount of time to respond and diagnose online, post links and information, sort out threads, ETC, a task for which none of us is paid for doing. |
Buellistic
| Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2015 - 08:24 am: |
|
Can't we all just get along ??? Iam Noone |
Vsingle
| Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2015 - 08:35 pm: |
|
Gearhead &Ez - I posted the link to the manual for your convenience. Then I get a whole paragraph from EZ about where I should be referencing manuals. Between the two of you, this thread hasn't been particularly enjoyable for me, but that's the way it goes. I have nothing but respect for each of you; doesn't mean I'm going to send you daisies and tribute every time you post. If I don't like something or don't agree with you, likely I will say something. |
|