Author |
Message |
Rokoneer
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 08:35 am: |
|
Have you seen this thing in the new issue of Cycle World? Very unique machine to say the least with a design unlike anything I've seen. Opinions? I would post a link to a picture of it but was unable to find any on the web. edited by Rokoneer on February 28, 2004 |
Bud
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 09:42 am: |
|
here's one i like the hellcat more |
Road_thing
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 09:57 am: |
|
Robb Report-Motorcycling has a feature on it. I think it's a concept bike or prototype. r-t (No, I don't normally read the Robb Report, but Bomber turned me on to it!) |
Tucsonxb9s
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 09:58 am: |
|
Man that's skanky lookin'...the bike is interesting tho. |
Newfie_buell
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 10:03 am: |
|
I think its fugly!!!! How do you ride that thing??? |
Glitch
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 10:11 am: |
|
Ugly, maybe, but ya gotta love those headlights! |
Dynarider
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 11:01 am: |
|
I think they both are hideous. |
Fullpower
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 03:18 pm: |
|
the left side exhaust, and telelever front fork are both interesting. the left side primary, with right side final is a definite step up from the normally screwed up big twin variant. the long legged unit with the goofy riding boots would look real funny wedged between the back of the saddle and the rear fender... oops. |
Seeeu911
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 05:30 pm: |
|
far reaching innovative and wonderful thinking outside the box. I wish Buell made concept bikes. |
Crusty
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 05:39 pm: |
|
They do. The difference is you can buy one from a dealer. Who else has Oil in the swingarm, gas in the frame and perimeter brakes on a production bike? |
Tim
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 06:14 pm: |
|
Not a big twin. Engine is XR1000 based. |
Davegess
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 06:29 pm: |
|
Interesting in a very odd sort of way but ugly and I can't imagine that it really works all that well. Not doubt it will be fast as it will be light but I rather doubt it will run with a real sport bike in the twisties. Gotta give them credti for different but the designer sounds way too much like the art school losers I used to have to listen to at work.
|
Rokoneer
| Posted on Saturday, February 28, 2004 - 07:42 pm: |
|
According to the CW article this bike will be produced for sale looking very much like the photo. First 13 will be XR1000 based motors and cost $60K then the next batch will be Sporty based motors and run $40K. A sideline to the article on this bike is some interesting observations about motorcycle style from Craig Vetter who thinks the Wraith is indeed interesting but is very curious as to how it will look when it has to be fitted with lights, blinkers and a license plate frame as these are typically things that are hard to place and have look good. |
Koz5150
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 02:25 am: |
|
The question is not how do you ride that thing... It is WHY WOULD YOU RIDE THAT THING??? |
Buellerthanyou
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 03:25 am: |
|
You guys are nuts! The bike is awesome-looking and the "marketing representative" is gorgeous (see http://www.fastdates.com/MeetModels/12AndraCobb/AndraCobb01.HTM for more "info"). I've always likes Confederate's designs, though I could have a stable full of Buells for the same money (and would rather). At least its "different in every sense"! HellBuelly J http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hellbuellies/ "When I rode Buells, I didn't ride for fun. . .It's no pink tea, and mollycoddles had better stay out. It's a contest and everything that implies, a struggle for supremacy, a survival of the fittest." --Ty "Buellistic" Cobb P.S. Plus, Andra's from Austin! Yeehaaaaaa! edited by buellerthanyou on February 29, 2004 |
Sgtbuell
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 04:08 am: |
|
Buellerthanyou Thanks for the link. Damn shes a looker.
|
Seeeu911
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 05:55 am: |
|
Buellerthanyou great link ! Crusty ... thin out your koolaid mix man.. |
Crusty
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 07:07 am: |
|
Seeeu, you asked a question. I answered it. I think my answer is a valid one. |
Dynarider
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 11:00 am: |
|
Crusty ... thin out your koolaid mix man.. LOL |
Jasonblue
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 10:27 pm: |
|
The bike is absolutely "diferent". Some of the design characteristics are beautiful, and some of them are, well..... I just don't think I could get past those forks. It is a good start, I'll be interested to see the final production model. Now the Hellcat on the other hand. My ABSOLUTE dream bike. |
Sarodude
| Posted on Sunday, February 29, 2004 - 11:05 pm: |
|
quote:very curious as to how it will look when it has to be fitted with lights, blinkers and a license plate frame as these are typically things that are hard to place and have look good
I wanna know why people INSIST on designing bikes while omitting these REQUIRED items. Look, are you gonna design a bike without a motor 'cause the thing doens't look good? Please, start INTEGRATING requirements into the effing designs... -Saro |
Mr_grumpy
| Posted on Monday, March 01, 2004 - 05:45 am: |
|
I know what you mean Saro but you have to understand that those parts aren't available in Lego Technic for the design stage. |
Mr_grumpy
| Posted on Monday, March 01, 2004 - 06:20 am: |
|
Oops I boobed, not Lego, it's Meccano! I knew I'd seen those forks somewhere before!
|
Bomber
| Posted on Monday, March 01, 2004 - 09:56 am: |
|
I like it . . .although the art school losers are familiar to me (thanks for the grin-producing memory, Dave), at least this one knows how to weld and machine and make stuff . . . .. while I wouldn't want to ride the Wraith for a 6 hour run, I like it alot . . .stretch the boundries a bit! thang -- remind me to buy you a beer! |
Road_thing
| Posted on Monday, March 01, 2004 - 12:03 pm: |
|
I like it, too. I don't necessarily want one, I just like it. Of course, I already had a Confederate. The twin grim realities of limited utility and dismal resale value are just too much for my old mind to sidestep again! r-t bomber--yer on, compadre! |
Jmartz
| Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 08:33 am: |
|
Top end is XR but lower end seems S&S. Why would they choose 4-speed? Other than that I think is cool although a bit thick. |
Jrh
| Posted on Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 01:18 pm: |
|
I like some of the things about it like the supposed lightness and simplicity,i wonder if the belt drive primary reduces spin-up weight and maybe even benifits shifting due to less or better controlled slack compared to chain?.From the side the bike looks like a crawling inchworm though.But to me the XBS looks like a grasshopper,the R a beluga.They all look odd to me in there own way i guess, except the S1 or the Duc 916-996. |