| Author |
Message |
    
Johnboy777
| | Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 08:40 pm: | 
|
Can anyone get us the number of all XB12X's produced in 2007?
Just 2007.
Thanks |
Johnboy777
| | Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 09:27 pm: |
|
I'd like to officially go on record right here and now as saying that based on my own WAG
science the 2007 crank failures represent a catastrophic occurrence rate of 1.6%
That means (according to The WAG Institute of Science) that all 2007 Uly owners
have a 1 in 63 chance of having a catastrophic crank failure.
Carry on.
.. |
Reepicheep
| | Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 09:35 pm: |
|
99.8% of all statistics are made up.  |
Ourdee
| | Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 11:35 pm: |
|
Automotive? Significant? I worked at a grey iron foundry making engine blocks. They put scores on the defect that made it into a customers hands. Drop of oil on the floor in the garage. Not that bad, maybe a 5. Customer had to walk home, that's a 20. What was considered significant? One customer walking home! Not 2, or 5, or 20. Just ONE. |
Union_man
| | Posted on Friday, August 26, 2011 - 12:00 am: |
|
Froggy I pinged you.
(Message edited by union_man on August 26, 2011) |
Skifastbadly
| | Posted on Friday, August 26, 2011 - 03:48 pm: |
|
When I ran a software group, we had two dimensions for bugs...the first was the likelihood of a user running into it (frequency) and the second was the consequences of running into it (seriousness). Serious meant loss of data, crashing, computer bursting into flames, etc. Thus, we would let bugs go 'til the next release if they were frequent but not serious. The serious ones we fixed immediately and sent patches. What's this have to do with the current thread? Nothing, I'm just bored. |
|
