Author |
Message |
Johnboy777
| Posted on Sunday, April 18, 2010 - 06:23 pm: |
|
Cold Start Enrichment Has anyone played around with these values using ECMspy, and with what success? Thanks |
Id073897
| Posted on Sunday, April 18, 2010 - 06:31 pm: |
|
Yes, good. |
Johnboy777
| Posted on Sunday, April 18, 2010 - 06:39 pm: |
|
""Yes, good."" Hey Gunter - I was thinking if I increase the Cold Start Enrichment at 65C, 130C & 180C to 110% ... that will fatten up my map while the engine is at that temperature. Vielen Dank für eure Hilfe! John (Message edited by johnboy777 on April 18, 2010) |
Johnboy777
| Posted on Sunday, April 18, 2010 - 09:02 pm: |
|
I guess what I'm thinking here is that the bike never really (technically) goes off of Cold Start Enrichment - it just falls to 100% and stays there after it hits 130C (266deg. F) I think that this may be the case, based on the fact that the Cold Start Enrichment table goes as high as 260C or 500F . |
Teeps
| Posted on Monday, April 19, 2010 - 08:53 am: |
|
Are you having hard starting issues? |
Johnboy777
| Posted on Monday, April 19, 2010 - 10:19 am: |
|
No Teeps, Simply trying to understand the Cold Start Enrichment table - and if I can use it as a way to fatten up a stock fuel map, across the board. Based on the fact that the Cold Start Enrichment table goes as high as 260C or 500F - I think that the Cold Start Enrichment map may NOT disengage per se, but simply, as it gets to 100%, normalize based on the value of 100%. So that if you set the value at 110% - it would read that value even after it has warmed up - and keep that value (10% richer) throughout its operation. Just a thought ( I could be off base here)- I'll try it out shortly. There again, I want the bike at 13.1 - 13.5.... not 14.7:1 which I think is way too lean for an air-colled motor. John |
|