G oog le Buell 1125R Forum | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » 1125R Superbike Board » Archives 001 » Archive through December 25, 2009 » DarkHorseMoto 1125 Swing Arm Lift Spool » Archive through December 11, 2009 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jersey_thunder
Posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 - 07:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

BEARINGS...So they spin when lifting

my .02

jt
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dwiggs
Posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 - 08:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I dig the idea of bearings, but how much would that add to the cost?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Skully
Posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 - 08:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Lots of good points folks. Here is Nick's spool with a slight draft on both sides of the groove:





Let me know which version you like best:

A) The rounded design or
B)The angular design

Thanks,
Keith
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

D_adams
Posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 - 09:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

If you're doing these manually, I'd guess the angular design would be easier to manufacture. If it's done in a turret lathe, I guess it wouldn't matter all that much. Maybe offer both versions? The set I made for myself took about 20 minutes the first time doing it on a Jet lathe.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Skully
Posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 - 09:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

All of our sliders are machined on a CNC lathe. With the quantity we've sold, getting the consistency that I require manually would have put some poor machinist in the grave!

Keith
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dwiggs
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 02:06 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Keith, the round design with the taper looks great.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

A_s_r
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 11:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I agree, REV B (W/ TAPER) looks very good.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zac4mac
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 12:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I keep looking at the OEM design and wondering if there isn't a "tear-off" function built in.
Looks like, on hard enough side force(enough to damage the swingarm?) the cap would tear away and absorb rather than transmit the force?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

D_adams
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 12:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Zac, that also adds the question, what's the stock bolt made of? aluminum, mild steel or something harder yet?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 12:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"Blake,
Your design does not leave much aluminum to actually support the bike. You have very little bearing surface on the bolt shank unlike the designs proposed above.
ac"


Good point. That does look a bit thin.

What do you figure the design load on the spool is? At most 400 LBs (two people sitting on the bike while on the stand). In terms of stress, about nil. Given 60601-T6, the stresses are ridiculously low.

The OEM spool is plastic with a tiny aluminum insert, yes?

As noted, if needed, cut a relief to allow the protective tapered flange near the swingarm.

Having some experience at the track trying to urgently get bikes on lifts, the added flair(s) to help guide the stand onto the spools is very helpful and also welcome as an aid to protecting the swingarm from damage due to being hit by the stand.


Blake's Spool Suggestions Rev02
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 12:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Might also consider increasing the bearing area where stand contacts spool. If the stand isn't perfectly adjusted to the exact width between the two spools the stand won't engage reliably. Something maybe more like...


3
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Avc8130
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 12:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Blake,
The material selected has no direct bearing on the stresses. The stresses are independent the material. Material must be selected to withstand the stresses.
I have not done FEA, and I don't plan on it since this isn't MY design and I have no financial reason to do any REAL design work. I just like to work on the side of caution when engineering from the hip.
The factory design puts aluminum AND bolt directly under the area the stand forks should hit. Your proposals put air.
ac
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

D_adams
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 12:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Blake, did you get the info I sent you? I replied to your email, never got a response back.

Thx,
Dean
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1324
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 01:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Blake,

The OE spool is plastic, and the insert is small. However,the size of the insert has nothing to do the function. It's hard to see in the cross section, but the stock spool actually has a molded rib in the lift 'groove'. That rib lines up directly with the edge of the aluminum insert, so it is almost like the factory put that there to force people to put the stands on the inside of the ribs (toward the swingarm). Fair strategy except that it is too close the swingarm, especially once you consider the angle on the swingarm. At any rate, the stock spool relies on the aluminum insert's bearing area to lift because the stock spool is plastic. You are correct that stresses are low (regardless of material), but why sell ourselves short on strength for the sake of bolt length? Shallower c'bore would require less machine time...if we're counting. Of course, this is just my opinion on the matter. Not claiming gospel here, so take it for what it's worth.

The angled inside guide would serve the purpose nicely, I agree. The rounded shape was selected to mirror the outside shape...which was retained to give a stock look...and reduce machine time. No other reasons.

Bearing area (groove) was selected to accommodate a 3/16" spool lift bracket plus about a 1/16" clearance.

D,

My stock bolts were some grade steel. I'll take a look at them tonight to confirm grade, but they definitely weren't aluminum.

-In general, and not directed at anyone in particular-

Having any spool on the swingarm will increase risk of damage during a spill. Hence why Keith is looking to offer a complete slider/spool package. If you want maximum safety, get some axle sliders and remove the spools when not in use. Of course, Keith can correct me if I'm speaking out of turn.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 01:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Avc,

<sigh>

Can you give me some credit here for knowing a little about what we speak? I've been a professional stress analyst for over 25 years.

Yes, more material is stronger.

However, 6061-T6 Aluminum alloy is MUCH stronger than plastic.

In bending, peak stress is proportional to the depth squared, in our case the diameter, squared. Therefore, with the aluminum moved from the inner to the outer diameter, the strength of the section is increased by a HUGE margin, despite the inner diameter now consisting of "air" as you say.

In the OEM, the aluminum insert must carry ALL the shear loading. Its area for that is tiny compared to the hollowed out all aluminum version.

The applicable structural section, a hollow circular section, relative to the loads is VERY robust. I mean VERY robust. It's good to go. Absolutely no worries. : ) The weak link is the screw and the female aluminum threaded connection in the swingarm. It's possible the OEM spool is designed to fail before damaging the swingarm. Might not be a bad idea.

FEA is not required. This is a very simple problem. My/I and VQ/Ib.

Give it a shot.

(Message edited by blake on December 10, 2009)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 01:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Dean,

I'll take a look at my email and get back to you asap.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 01:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

1234,

Are you sure that "rib" is molded in? Looks to me like it could easily be deformation in the plastic as a result of installation after tightening the screw.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1324
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 01:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

^^^Positive. The plastic part is not loaded when the bolt is tightened. There is clearance on all interfaces.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sl33py
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 01:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I Like rev02 or 3 that have the inside angled bit to help the spool seat w/o scratching the swingarm.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 02:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

1234,

So then the plastic spool part spins freely in place after installation?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1324
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 02:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

One of mine spins, the other binds and barely spins. Regardless, you can tell its molded by looking at it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Avc8130
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 02:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I can spin my plastic parts when the bolt is tightened. That is the whole point of the aluminum insert. It provides the structural support.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 02:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It provides the structural support.

Bingo! And it is tiny, yes?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Avc8130
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 02:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

And it where the fork goes, yes?

I dont get this whole redesign of the wheel effort. It is a fricken swingarm spool. Frankly just about ANYTHING will work.

Design something short that doesn't interfere with the swingarm and keeps the forks from rubbing on the swingarm. That was the design objective. It was met with the VERY FIRST design proposal.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xtreme6669
Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009 - 11:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

lets get this thing done so I can order a set. What is the web-site that will be selling them?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1324
Posted on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 06:30 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.darkhorsemoto.com/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xtreme6669
Posted on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 08:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Sweet, Thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 11:21 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"And it where the fork goes, yes? "

Which may be important in the OEM plastic spool, but entirely inconsequential for a 6061-T6 all aluminum alloy spool, yes?

"I dont get this whole redesign of the wheel effort. It is a fricken swingarm spool. Frankly just about ANYTHING will work.

Design something short that doesn't interfere with the swingarm and keeps the forks from rubbing on the swingarm. That was the design objective. It was met with the VERY FIRST design proposal."


My apologies. I hadn't realized that the project manager had cut off our R&D budget. It seems that constructive criticism may not be welcome here by some. Discussing engineering issues and designs is something that I very much enjoy. Sorry to have caused trouble.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 11:27 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1324
Posted on Friday, December 11, 2009 - 11:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

That is a sweet looking boss. Mine look like they were welded on by a blind monkey. That one looks cast in from this angle!
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration