Author |
Message |
Corporatemonkey
| Posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - 05:14 am: |
|
I am not stupid enough to laugh at Jaime's BMW, there have been days I would have given an organ for a windscreen like that. Hell there have been times when I have been so hot and tired that minivans looked attractive... |
Hughlysses
| Posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - 09:12 am: |
|
Anybody else notice that almost none of the "motorcycle news" sites (www.motorcycle-daily.com, www.motorcycle.com, www.motorcycle-usa.com, etc.) have a feature on the 2010 Buells yet? What's up with that? |
Buellinachinashop
| Posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - 09:30 am: |
|
what's new for 2010 other than decals and them crushing their own bike? The 1125RR made some noise about 2 weeks ago. |
Jaimec
| Posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - 09:37 am: |
|
Yeah, when Harley mixes and matches existing parts to create a "NEW" model, it's news. When Buell makes numerous mechanical and electronic improvements to existing models, it's not. All part of being the red-headed stepchild. |
Hexangler
| Posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - 10:16 am: |
|
Court won't answer this thread because there is no positive spin on this tripe. |
Buellinachinashop
| Posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - 10:24 am: |
|
The Milwaukee Journal's Business section headlined Harley's 2010 line up the "widest new product release in company history" Adding glitter to an existing turd and bringing back previously cancelled products does not a new product make. |
Bikertrash05
| Posted on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - 10:29 am: |
|
LOL, the Journal IS quite a worthless opinion paper anyway. |
|