G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Old School Buell » Archive through March 30, 2008 » Why Different Swingarms on S3's? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Seventy1
Posted on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 09:47 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I've noticed that older (pre-99?) S3's have rectangular tube swingarms and the newer ones have what looks to be cast triangular arms. Anyone know why and when they changed? Any noticeable stiffness improvement in the new style? Thanks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Loki
Posted on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 10:20 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Just a running change across the model lines at that time. The latter are better for stiffness.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bad_karma
Posted on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 01:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think you have hid it on the head, stiffness.
Joe
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tripp
Posted on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 03:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

if i remember correctly like 300% increase in stiffness! and it was 1999 for tubers across the board.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jstfrfun
Posted on Monday, March 24, 2008 - 04:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

As I'm told the cure for the swingarm twisties is a set from a 99 or2K X1 which has been parted out. Best to get everything from the mount plate back to the axel. But don't try to get it for a melody, a good clean one will cost you,and will solve your problem beautifully.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Monday, March 24, 2008 - 05:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'd have to ask why, but I know our race team specifically did *not* switch to the later swingarms when they came out. They kept using the steel arms...but I'd have to ask to find out why. This was back when we were roadracing the S1 chassis.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1313
Posted on Monday, March 24, 2008 - 11:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The cast Aluminum swingarm, believe it or not, is heavier than the steel swingarm. Exact figures escape me. Yes, it is stiffer too, but the additional weight may have been what kept the racers from adoring it.

1313
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 - 08:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The cast Aluminum swingarm, believe it or not, is heavier than the steel swingarm

That steel arm must be REALLY light the Aluminum one is down right feathery
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom_k
Posted on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 - 08:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I thought the racers used a braced steel arm for better drive chain clearance.

TK
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aaomy
Posted on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 - 12:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The al swing arms were quoted as being 200% stiffer,, “the number i heard ” .. doesn’t really matter just stiffer than the former.. Early al ones were heavier than the steal.. But later ones weigh in at about the same as the steel ones. Most races use smaller diameter sprockets front and rear.. That would cause the chain to hit the al swing arm.. Braced swing arms were used by the racing teams and s2 owners,, whom cannot run the al ones with out mods or limited rear swing arm stroke. Personally I love the look of the polished al arms,, i am currently working on a braced steel one for my s2t to allow full swing arm travel with out modifying the frame but give the stiffer feel. If you are considering switching to the al arm I would suggest looking for a 2001 or up arm.. And shy away form the earlier arms,, hope some of this helps,, Aaron
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration