Author |
Message |
Timn
| Posted on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 08:57 am: |
|
Does anyone have any history with any windscreens other than stock or zerogravity +3. My zero gravity broke yesterday, and i would like to explore all my options. My zero gravity +3 worked ok but still had turbulance around my helmet.How would the stock plus a laminar lip work compared to the +3? How about rifle? Thanks Mike |
Jusask
| Posted on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 09:49 am: |
|
I bought a S3T last November and unfortunately only put about 50mi. on it before I took it in for it's 10k svc and haven't been on it since. It's been friggin cold here in WI. It has the laminar lip. My last S3T had the zero gravity +3. My initial take on the difference is that, the laminar creates less turbulance around the helmet than the Zero Gravity does. |
Timn
| Posted on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 11:04 am: |
|
Terry Do you have the stock windscreen with the laminar lip on it? Any pics? Thanks Mike |
Ratbuell
| Posted on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 05:26 pm: |
|
I've got an S2, summertime I run stock, winter I run a Gustaffson +2. I'm 6'4" and the +2 is quite nice in the winter. I could probably go taller, but the +2 already makes turbulence affect the bike more than the stock height. But it does a good job keeping me in 'the bubble'. |
Jusask
| Posted on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 06:07 pm: |
|
My bike has a Zero Gravity windscreen with the Laminar lip attached to it, but the zero gravity appears to have the stock windscreen dimensions. |
|