Author |
Message |
Bernard
| Posted on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 - 01:44 am: |
|
Got the "25 Years" book as a birthday present and love it. However, I still don't have an answer why the Thunderbolt was named S2 instead of, let's say S1. Why starting with the S2, then follow with the S1, then the M2? What's the secret? |
Spiderman
| Posted on Friday, December 18, 2009 - 12:45 am: |
|
Because, the S2 is ment to be ridden on both wheels while the S1 on just the back |
Tbolt98
| Posted on Friday, December 18, 2009 - 01:58 pm: |
|
sounds about right! |
Davegess
| Posted on Friday, December 18, 2009 - 08:27 pm: |
|
I could be wrong and hopefully Erik will pop on and correct me but the S1 was already past the rough idea stage when they decided to update the RS and make it the first of the new company bikes instead of going for a totally new design. Trying to get to market fast before somebody at Juneau woke up and stopped the whole deal |
Ratbuell
| Posted on Friday, December 18, 2009 - 11:01 pm: |
|
I always thought it was 2 seat vs. 1 seat. Make that 1/2 seat, LOL. |
Court
| Posted on Friday, December 18, 2009 - 11:14 pm: |
|
I'm with Dave. The S1 was developed before the S2 |
Froggy
| Posted on Saturday, December 19, 2009 - 12:38 am: |
|
What happened to the P1 and P2? Were they cubed without seeing the light of day? |
Metra6924
| Posted on Saturday, December 19, 2009 - 10:08 am: |
|
Just a theory: Pittsburgh Performance Products = P3? |
Faseljd
| Posted on Saturday, December 19, 2009 - 03:48 pm: |
|
P3 Blast P4 Vrod |
|