Author |
Message |
Ekruizenga
| Posted on Saturday, September 12, 2009 - 02:13 pm: |
|
I was happy with how smooth the the HP is on the low end, probably still need to tweak it a little. Running K&N with OSB tune. It was the first 1125r they had done and the back wheel started really jumping all over the place initially on the run up. |
Carbonbigfoot
| Posted on Saturday, September 12, 2009 - 04:34 pm: |
|
Nice! R |
D_adams
| Posted on Saturday, September 12, 2009 - 06:15 pm: |
|
What did they charge you for that and how many runs did they do? One or three? |
Ekruizenga
| Posted on Saturday, September 12, 2009 - 06:41 pm: |
|
It was a shootout, first 50 bikes paid $10 each, they did 3 runs. I don't know if this line is the best or the average of the 3. I saw the screen with all 3 an they were very close together. |
Sleeper_777
| Posted on Sunday, September 13, 2009 - 11:27 am: |
|
Good run. I have the OSB software tune, just not installed it yet; waiting for 1st maintenance at 675 miles. Glad I purchased it. I was wondering if it was worth the money; seems to be based on your run. Since it was not stated, I'm guessing the solenoid is installed? Regards, Chris |
Ekruizenga
| Posted on Sunday, September 13, 2009 - 11:53 am: |
|
No Selenoid, The Dyno guys said that they were doing the runs in 4th gear so it wouldn't of affected the run anyway. I had a top speed of 136 in 4th at redline. I don't think I really gained to much top end but it really smooths out the low end. An 08 1125r with a Jardine can and 5z flash, ran right after mine and he had 121/122hp and I think 68 torque. Jimmy can you post up your run? I'm interested in seeing your curve compared to mine. |
Torquaholic
| Posted on Sunday, September 13, 2009 - 02:25 pm: |
|
Is that the OSB performance flash ($320), or the ($80) software with your own changes made? I was under the impression the OSB performance tune was supposed to make 138hp/80tq. |
Redscuell
| Posted on Sunday, September 13, 2009 - 11:50 pm: |
|
The above results seem quite typical of the factory tune, confirming the half-dozen others I've seen on Badweb: hp ~127, tq ~72. My dyno run shows a 9-10 each increase, thanks to (1) my triple-outlet muffler and (2) my twin velocity stacks (100 mm tall).
Those dyno runs were cheap, and so were the mods that made the add'l power -- about $50. What cost me more than a couple of bucks were the software, and runs, required to smooth the fueling. This graph is just for the very slow speeds:
For the high speeds through wot:
Runs are on either 95 ron or 98 ron, don't remember. Haven't given any attention on the spark tables, though. Driveability was quite unpleasant in slow traffic because, the sniffer revealed, fueling was very lean (16+!) there. The low-speed fueling needed attention because the bike was quite 'jerky' at, e.g., a turn at a light in traffic. The jerky is gone -- though when my stalking makes her run on my post, the 'jerk' will be back! 'Course at least one other jerk will weigh in with my notation (see the chart) that these power figures are 'uncorrected'. But since I put that there myself, guess I get points for honesty! (Message edited by redscuell on September 13, 2009) |
Fresnobuell
| Posted on Monday, September 14, 2009 - 01:19 am: |
|
Show the baseline dyno. It's all meaningless without it. |
Ekruizenga
| Posted on Monday, September 14, 2009 - 07:24 am: |
|
Red - Thanks its nice to see. I just don't have the coin or time to use a tuning center, so I opted for Daves plug and play program. And the biggest item I also noticed was the smoothing of the street driveability in the lower gears and RPM's. As far as the 138hp this program is supposed to make, been told it is all variable based on the bike and dyno variables. The guys who were doing my dyno didn't even strap it down they were sitting on it to keep it on the dyno - and in the beginning it almost jumped right off the side of the dyno on them. Scared the crap out of me but I had to laugh at the look on the guys face when it happened. |
Blake
| Posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 - 02:35 am: |
|
Where was the dyno's sniffer located? |
T_man
| Posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 - 08:14 am: |
|
Red - nice AFR charts. Did you globally enrichen (by locking AFV higher) if so, by how much? |
Redscuell
| Posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 - 08:33 pm: |
|
Dunno why my stalker persists in posting inane comments about my posts. I typically ignore hers. The sniffer is up the third pipe, which is directly fed by the final collector chamber of the otherwise-stock muffler. The remapping was done the hard way: a dozen dyno runs between increasing and decreasing the fuel in a hundred discreet points. |
Teach
| Posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 - 10:12 pm: |
|
Ekruizenga The program did make 138 hp, it was on my bike. Lots of variables, maybe the way the bike was broken in. jim |
Puredrive
| Posted on Friday, October 02, 2009 - 01:19 pm: |
|
Strange on how a lot of these Dyno runs are done in STD correction.. Ask for SAE correction printouts. |
|