Author |
Message |
Ferris_von_bueller
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 02:41 pm: |
|
July 7, 2009 Dr. Paul L. Williams "In my own life, in my own small way, I have tried to give back to this country that has given me so much," she said. "See, that's why I left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service," Michelle Obama No, Michele Obama does not get paid to serve as the First Lady and she doesn't perform any official duties. But this hasn't deterred her from hiring an unprecedented number of staffers to cater to her every whim and to satisfy her every request in the midst of the Great Recession. Just think Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing china for the White House during the Civil War. And Mamie Eisenhower had to shell out the salary for her personal secretary. How things have changed! If you're one of the tens of millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at Wal-Mart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers, prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of Miz Michelle are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by John Q. Public: 1. $172,2000 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff) 2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady) 3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary) 4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady) 5. Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady) 6. $90,000 - Medina, David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady) 7. $84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady) 8. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady) 9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady) 10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary) 11. Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary) 12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady) 13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady) 14. Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady) 15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady) 16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady) 17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady) 18. Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office) 19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady) 20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary) 21. Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant) 22. Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady) Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12652 There has never been anyone in the White House at any time that has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady's social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one; Laura Bush one; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social help came from the President's own pocket. Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and "First Hairstylist" Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One to Europe. |
Teddagreek
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 03:15 pm: |
|
Ruthless |
Blake
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 03:36 pm: |
|
www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12652 Wow. If that is accurate, it is disgraceful. |
Court
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 03:56 pm: |
|
Utter embarrassment. The same folks who want to determine what "fair" salaries are for private business. Let' be honest. The Obama administration has filled government offices with blooming idiots many of whom who have a chip on their shoulder for "the upper class". The only wealthy they detest is that they can't get their hands on. Keep an eye on Rahm. |
Gentleman_jon
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 04:11 pm: |
|
You think Rahm is trouble, check out his brother Ezekiel, Dr. Death. |
Ferris_von_bueller
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 05:21 pm: |
|
Some quotes from Dr. Death Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely 'lipstick' cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change," he wrote last year (Health Affairs Feb. 27, 2008). Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, "as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others" (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008). He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those "who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia" (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. '96). |
Moxnix
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 05:33 pm: |
|
Lincoln freed the slaves in 1863. 6 months into this admin, we are putting our own shackles on. |
Ferris_von_bueller
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 05:54 pm: |
|
|
Nevrenuf
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 06:24 pm: |
|
this one has been going around lately. sad as to how true this is.(this was done in 19380 (Message edited by nevrenuf on August 03, 2009) |
Crusty
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 06:44 pm: |
|
Bitch, bitch, bitch. Ever since you had the kid, all you want to do is go steady. |
Cataract2
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 10:47 pm: |
|
Oh, about that no higher taxes for the middle class thing, yeah... http://www.rr.com/home/home/article/rr/9000/852111 4/2_Obama_officials_No_guarantee_taxes_wont_go_up 2 Obama officials: No guarantee taxes won't go up Published - Aug 02 2009 09:24PM EDT By PHILIP ELLIOTT - Associated Press Writer President Barack Obama's treasury secretary said Sunday he cannot rule out higher taxes to help tame an exploding budget deficit, and his chief economic adviser would not dismiss raising them on middle-class Americans as part of a health care overhaul. As the White House sought to balance campaign rhetoric with governing, officials appeared willing to extend unemployment benefits. With former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan saying he is "pretty sure we've already seen the bottom" of the recession, Obama aides sought to defend the economic stimulus and calm a jittery public. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and National Economic Council Director Larry Summers both sidestepped questions on Obama's intentions about taxes. Geithner said the White House was not ready to rule out a tax hike to lower the federal deficit; Summers said Obama's proposed health care overhaul needs funding from somewhere. "There is a lot that can happen over time," Summers said, adding that the administration believes "it is never a good idea to absolutely rule things out, no matter what." During his presidential campaign, Obama repeatedly vowed "you will not see any of your taxes increase one single dime." But the simple reality remains that his ambitious overhaul of how Americans receive health care _ promised without increasing the federal deficit _ must be paid for. "If we want an economy that's going to grow in the future, people have to understand we have to bring those deficits down. And it's going to be difficult, hard for us to do. And the path to that is through health care reform," Geithner said. "We're not at the point yet where we're going to make a judgment about what it's going to take." Selling that proposal, however, has proved tricky. On Friday, the government released a report that suggested the worst recession in the United States since World War II appears on the verge of ending. The economy dipped only slightly in the second quarter of this year _ falling at a 1 percent annual pace, better than expected. The president cautioned against instant turnaround, though. "Well, as I've said, I think we maybe are beginning to see the end of the recession, but it's still going to be some time before we are seeing companies hiring again. That's usually the last thing that happens," Obama said in an interview with Univision that aired on Sunday. "So I think we are still going to have a tough remainder of the year _ probably until next year _ but, you know, at least what we are seeing _ we've pulled back from the possibility of a depression. That's not the danger." Many analysts think the economy is starting to grow again in the current quarter, setting up a long-awaited recovery. "Most private forecasters _ and let's use their judgment _ suggest you're going to see unemployment start to come down maybe beginning in the second half of next year," Geithner said, adding those same economists predict positive growth during the second half of this year. At the same time, Geithner and other administration officials are contemplating how to ask Congress to extend _ again _ unemployment benefits for the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs in recent months. The proposal drew measured support from Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., as long as the benefits are drawn from the already approved economic stimulus package. "We need to take care of those who are unemployed, but we also need to make sure they get jobs," he said. Those jobs, though, are still elusive. Greenspan said the economy is slowly coming back. "Collapse, I think, is now off the table. We were teetering for a while," he said. Greenspan said he doesn't think the Federal Reserve should be considering raising interest rates to ward off inflation, although he added that the Fed will have to rein in credit and raise rates at some point. Obama's opponent for the presidency, Sen. John McCain, questioned whether the administration's actions will prove beneficial for the country. "I think it's pretty clear, if you pump trillions of dollars into the economy, you will see some recovery," the Arizona Republican said while giving Obama credit for the improvement. "But the long-term consequences, I think, are going to be, unfortunately, devastating unless we do something about it." |
Hdbobwithabuell
| Posted on Sunday, August 02, 2009 - 10:52 pm: |
|
Hope and Change... It's here! |
Imonabuss
| Posted on Monday, August 03, 2009 - 01:48 am: |
|
These people are incredible. Obama would love to kill off the seniors, heck most were old enough and wise enough to vote against him. |
|