G oog le Buell 1125R Forum | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » 1125R Superbike Board » Archives 001 » Archive through July 30, 2008 » 1125R Gas mileage « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through July 07, 2008Ccryder30 07-07-08  12:26 pm
         

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chadhargis
Posted on Monday, July 07, 2008 - 03:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

You're right Neil....

On a short stroke engine, there is not much time to get fuel/air in and exhaust out without some overlap. The "suction" part of the intake stroke is so short in duration.

Makes me optimistic regarding the 1125's true potential. I'm thinking that they could get 160rwhp out of the engine pretty easy. If they want to bump the displacement, they could go superbike racing if they can get 200rwhp out of it. : )

Once you take a bike racing, the technology trickles down to the street and yields better bikes.

None of us are going to beat a bike up like a professional rider over the course of a race season.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spatten1
Posted on Monday, July 07, 2008 - 03:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I would not blame the engine layout yet. I think the fuel injection has to be sorted first.

DDFI3 has wrecked the mileage on the XB series, by 20% to 30%. Most DDFI2 XB riders report getting at least 50 mpg, myself included. The reports on the DDFI3 XBs are 35-40 mpg, with a few getting in the mid-40s.

(Message edited by spatten1 on July 07, 2008)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Monday, July 07, 2008 - 04:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I agree that the FI system is wack right now. At peak, though, I wouldn't bet on getting 50-60MPG.

I don't see that coming form any of the other equally tuned peer group. The RC8 is predicted to be upper 30's low 40's.

I do believe there is room to improve, but I don't believe that we will get miraculous fuel economy that we aren't seeing from other V-Twins of similar design and output.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spatten1
Posted on Monday, July 07, 2008 - 04:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yeah, it won't touch the long-stroke XBs, but upper 30's low 40's would be good for a performance engine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Monday, July 07, 2008 - 04:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

That, to me, would be a realistic target.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chadhargis
Posted on Monday, July 07, 2008 - 05:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

All this talk of fuel mileage makes me think of this:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zac4mac
Posted on Wednesday, July 09, 2008 - 10:04 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Just got back from Homecoming, ~1100 miles each way.
Reset AVG while there.
It's back to 37 where it always has been.

Z
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ccryder
Posted on Wednesday, July 09, 2008 - 10:16 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

My average is in the 37-40mpg range. IMHO, it's not bad for SO MUCH FUN!!!!!!!!!

Now back to your regular scheduled program.....

Time2Work ;+{
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spatten1
Posted on Wednesday, July 09, 2008 - 01:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

37-40 MPG sounds very reasonable for a performance bike. I'd be happy with that.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bobup
Posted on Monday, July 14, 2008 - 10:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

rode to Hollister yesterday and put 100 miles (going there) on the freeway mainly (65-75mph) and got 36mpg...

Elvira must like the open road, she even ran cooler at around 185.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Eagle1
Posted on Monday, July 14, 2008 - 07:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I took a couple little trips this past weekend and averaged 43mpg.

Granted, I had a tail win part of the time, helping me up to 48mph (I was gonna take a snapshot of that to tease )

But yeah, on average I see 35 with mixed driving, and 38-39 on the highway.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pkforbes87
Posted on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 01:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"I agree that the FI system is wack right now. At peak, though, I wouldn't bet on getting 50-60MPG. "

I'm getting 50 on a regular basis with my X1. 55 regularly on the highway.

Best ever was 64, all while doing 65mph on the highway after a fresh oil change, travelling downhill with a strong tailwind ;]

Do any of the aftermarket exhaust options improve fuel mileage on the 1125s?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jspeed
Posted on Sunday, July 20, 2008 - 11:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Are you guys getting your avg m.p.g. from the onboard computer readouts???? I have road 4 different 1125R's and haven't got the read out over 28 m.p.g. Normally I'm getting a read out of 25
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ridenusa4l
Posted on Monday, July 21, 2008 - 01:29 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

im averaging between 34-38mpg: ): )...my truck gets 13 on average lol...i don't even complain when i get below 30 its still better than my truck lol..: )..
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ponti1
Posted on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 - 05:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The Buell website is now listing MPG ratings for the 2009 1125R...39 city / 53 highway! Either they did some sort of modifications to the 2009 model, or someone is smoking crack. LOL!!!!
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration