G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board Archives » Archive through July 17, 2008 » FUELL mag S3T mistake? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jusask
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 10:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
According to the new Fuell magazine (on page 15) my 02 S3T only comes with 91 hp. This is my 2nd S3T (the first being an 00) and I coulda swore Erik wanted my bike to have 101 hp with thunderstorm heads. Someone please tell me if I'm wrong.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glitch
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 12:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
101 at the crank?
91 at the rear wheel?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cecil1
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 01:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
it also has a Firebolt from 01.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Grancuda
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 01:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
101 at the crank?
91 at the rear wheel?

That isn't enough of a drop for crank vs. rear wheel hp.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Darthane
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
Sounds like a mistake. Weren't the carbed M2s only listed as 91HP (crank) and the fuel-injected X1s and S3s were 101HP?

I noticed the XB9R thing myself. Only thing I can come up with is that they may have started production in late '01. Mine was a pretty early Firebolt, but it wasn't assembled until April, I think.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Froggy
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
It also says the 1125r is 1135cc
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Djkaplan
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
I wouldn't worry about it unless it actually made your bike feel less powerful.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spiderman
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
Those years are introduction dates not Model Year dates.

As for the HP they may have gotten it confused or a typo...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
I'm pretty sure the early S3T (97/98) was a non-thunderstorm bike. The first thunderstorm bike was the 98 S1W, and the first 101hp EFI bikes were 99 at which point the S3/T got the X1 motor.

So..."as introduced" in 1997, the S3T was indeed a 91hp lightning-motored bike.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spiderman
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
Circle takes the Square!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Josh_
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
98 S3/T were 101HP with TStorm heads. The S1WL and S3/T all came with TStorms in 98.

M2s didn't get TStorms until... 99? but had the older "Lightning" cams keeping HP at 91.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dfbutler
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
According to the specs in the owner's manual for my 99 S3, it is 101 HP
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Josh_
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 02:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
99 was the first year for fuel injection, (S3/T, X1) second year for 101HP TStorm heads (all, I think).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jusask
Posted on Friday, July 11, 2008 - 03:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)
Don't misunderstand, I'm aware Buell claims 101 at the crank for my S3T. I was trying to be sarcastic about the typo. I don't mean to take anything away from the 91hp bikes either. I had a 96 S1 and it ROCKED !!!!!
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration