G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Knowledge Vault (tech, parts, apparel, & accessories topics) » Engine » Fuel System: EFI/DDFI, Carb., Filter, Pump, Tank, Filler-Cap, Fuel » Archive through January 26, 2009 » Octane? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pkforbes87
Posted on Sunday, March 30, 2008 - 11:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

What are the fuel octane limits (high and low) that my 2000 x1 should be running? Engine is stock internally.

I've been using 91 as long as I can find it without ethanol.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Newbuellertoo
Posted on Sunday, March 30, 2008 - 12:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I generally use 91 in my 2000 s3. I sometimes throw in a tank of Sunoco 94 and maybe it's just my imagination, but it does seem to run better on the 94.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pkforbes87
Posted on Monday, March 31, 2008 - 05:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

A local track offers 94 octane. I think I'll give it a shot and see if there's any difference.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sparky
Posted on Monday, March 31, 2008 - 11:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Make sure that 94 octane is safe for the oxygen sensor, meaning unleaded.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pkforbes87
Posted on Monday, March 31, 2008 - 01:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Thanks for the heads up. I double checked and the track offers 94, 100, and 110 - all unleaded.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tim
Posted on Monday, March 31, 2008 - 10:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Unless your experiencing detonation with 91 octane there is no benefit to running higher octane fuel.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dentfixer
Posted on Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - 11:16 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

What Tim said is true. Higher octane is merely for the prevention of pre-ignition, or pinging as it is commonly called. Octane requirement is related to engine compression ratios. Higher compression requires higher octane fuel to prevent pre-ignition. If you put high octane fuel in a low compression engine, you are running on fuel that does not ignite as well as you need. Theoretically, you should get worse performance. Think about it.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration