G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » XBoard » Buell XBoard Archives » Downshifting!!! « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Americanmadexb
Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2006 - 11:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

is this necessary to do this everytime you stop? i know it helps stopping but does it do harm to the engine/tranny? i do it every time i slow down but i was just curious on how everyone does this!!!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Saintly
Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2006 - 11:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yes, it is necessary everytime you stop, otherwise you will burn out your clutch trying to take off in 5th.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pipefittermike
Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2006 - 11:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I am going to go out on a limb here and guess he meant downshifting as a means of slowing the bike rather than just using the brakes. If that is the case then no, I have never heard of this damaging the trans or motor. That is unless you decide to downshift from 5th to 1st doing 90 and let out the clutch. That would be bad.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bake
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 01:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I use the tranny for braking purposes knowing brakes are cheaper to maintain. The transmission was built to take the stress!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xbeau12s
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 02:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

hell yeah, That beefy V-twin does the best engine breaking there is. Your in trouble if it doesn't!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Snakedriver
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 02:24 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

But the moral or the story is NOT to use the clutch, but rather the engine as a break.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thumper2811
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 08:22 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'd say stick with your brakes they are much cheaper to maintain
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Djkaplan
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 09:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It's important to be able to match the rpm of the engine to the gear you've selected when downshifting. Compression braking is fine if you're stopping for a red light, but you have to be able to control it when braking heavily and downshifting before approaching a corner.

I always practice matching rpm to gear selection with every downshift. The payoff comes when you are able to downshift while leaned over without breaking traction on the rear tire.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Josh_cox
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 01:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

FWIW engine braking is not good for ANY engine or transmission. All is does is creates side loads in both directions instead of just one. You bore will be out of round much faster. Brakes are there for a reason, to stop the vehicle.

Engines/drivetrains are designed to not break under these stresses, but they will wear faster.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 02:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"hell yeah, That beefy V-twin does the best engine breaking there is. Your in trouble if it doesn't!"

Just so you know... The Buells have significantly less engine braking than the IL4 bikes...

They run more compression and lighter rotating assembly. There's less energy stored in their drivetrain so they produce more engine braking.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buelltroll
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 03:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I don't know what I4's you rode with less engine braking then an XB,
but EVERY I4 I've ridden has had hardly ANY engine braking compared to my bike.
I hardly ever use the brakes in the canyons because the engine braking is usually enough to slow me down enough to drop it in.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patrickh
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 04:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I4's have more engine braking than V-twins. There are a greater number of parts spinning inside which create more drag on the motor when it is spinning down.

The engine braking in a twin is very controlled and tractable which is why it feels different.

I downshift when slowing down, I want the power where it needs to be in case something bad happens. I can't imagine doing it any other way.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 04:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The first half of your post makes no sense...

The XB's have less engine braking than the IL4's... Unless you're talking a newer bike with a slipper...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Americanmadexb
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 04:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

yes i was talking about slowing the bike down! i do it almost everytime! i just didnt know if it would harm the tranny at all to go down 2 or 3 gears without letting the clutch out every gear.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Josh_cox
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 04:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

You do not have to let the clutch out: ) Just hold your clutch in a shift down when stopping.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 05:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

You want to match revs though... Don't just pull in the clutch at 105 in fourth and drop three gears instantly. You need to match revs whether you let out the clutch or not (I recommend letting out the clutch for every shift myself, and learn to modulate the brake lever while doing it...)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buckinfuell
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 06:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Josh,

I don't understand why downshifting and letting the engine decelerate the bike puts any more wear and tear on the parts than during upshifting and acceleration. Load on the engine the same regardless of whether you are slowing down or speeding up. Unless, of course, you drop down too fast. I also think it is good practice to have power to the back wheel as much as possible for contingency maneuvers. Just my 2 cents.

Ray
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Eric_m
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 07:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"I4's have more engine braking than V-twins. There are a greater number of parts spinning inside which create more drag on the motor when it is spinning down."

That makes no sense.

The trick to avoid engine damage when downshifting is to match your rpm to your roadspeed. It is like "heel-toeing" in a car. Your v-twin might not approve if you send it from idle to 7,000 rpm in .25 seconds.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Saintly
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 07:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I don't understand why downshifting and letting the engine decelerate the bike puts any more wear and tear on the parts than during upshifting and acceleration.

actually, Josh is right. Accel & decel do wear the engine differently. While accelerating the engine is pulling(rotating) all the other driveline components. But during decell, all the other components are pulling the engine around instead.

Consider your primary tensioner shoe as an example: its on the slack side during accel, but on decel it's the tension side and it's digging into the nylon shoe.

Same goes for all the engine components, the sprocket shaft(left side of crank) timken bearings have a thrust side that gets most of the load while rpm increases, but during engine braking the opposite bearing is getting the load.

The pinion gear that spins the cams is a good example too. The load on the engine is different when its not the thing doing the turning.



P.S. My first post above was just an attempt at humor, I didn't really think that the guy who started this thread was not returning his gearbox to low gear at each stop.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Josh_cox
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 07:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Acelleration force = ---------> this direction
Deceleration force = <--------- this direction

It is the same idea as to why rear tires wear more than fronts. They are dealing with two different forces rather than just braking. Engine braking doesn't put on more stress than accelerating by any means, it just doubles the amount of time your bike is under stress. I'll usually pull my clutch in around 30 mph to stop. Anything above that and I'll revmatch and engine brake and use the front and rear as well. Slowing is different than stopping to me. I guess I read the post differently.

(Message edited by josh_cox on June 26, 2006)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patrickh
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 08:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

an inline four having more off power engine braking makes perfect sense.

twice the number of cylinders; con rods; rings; valves; valve trains; chains; gears; ect.

I4's have more pieces rubbing together causing friction than do v-twins. You don't have to take my word for it though, I will dig out the Kevin Cameron article that explains it. I think it was written in 2002. Suprised me the first time I read it too.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cmm213
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 08:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

This is not rocket science guys, everyone rides different. If you want to down shift do it, if not just hold the clutch in and use the brake while going down through the gears. Me myself I usually ride aggressive and match gears and blip the gas when down shifting.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducxl
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 09:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

V-twins have significantly less engine braking force compared to an I-4.True statement.Kevin Cameron wrote a fine article on it.Has to do with flywheels and how a v-twin has more mass and inertia preventing a sudden slowdown.Just the opposite with I-4 engines(no flywheel inertia).That Cameron dude is brilliant.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Eric_m
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 10:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

First off- all engines have some sort of flywheel.
Second- If friction is what is causing engine braking, you have something wrong.

Compression is the key to engine braking... Which inline 4 cylinders do create more of.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jackbequick
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 10:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

All I know is that, by the seat of the pants impression and to the ear, there is nothing prettier or better than a couple of perfectly executed downshifts and a little off throttle time to set up for a city corner turn with a Buell.

I usually make it a point to give the front brake a gentle touch just to get the Back Off! device flashing my brake light so the cage behind me is not confused by my not needing to use the brakes much around town.

We can argue to death which engine has the best engine braking, but no one in their right mind will argue that the Buell does not have plenty enough of it. And there is no argument that two big cylinders sound better than a bunch of them itty bitty HoKawSuYa cylinders imitating a pack of lawnmowers.

Jack
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Monday, June 26, 2006 - 11:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Eric_m - I don't think that he meant that friction is the dominant force in engine braking. Just that it all adds up.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buckinfuell
Posted on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 - 05:43 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Saintly and Josh,

I understand your points in the wear bias of acceleration versus deceleration. I do not, however, think that the additional wear is that significant. Granted, if you know you are coming to a full stop over a short distance, by all means, pull the clutch in, hold it in, apply both brakes and downshift to first. Trying to accomplish this with engine braking would put undue stress and excessive wear on the components. The original poster, however, was talking about slowing down, in which case, I think it is poor riding practice to have the engine disengaged any longer than is necessary to switch gears. But then again, I suppose a lot has to do with why you are slowing down... i.e. entering a turn, avoiding an obstacle, etc. Anyway, I think we're all on the same page now.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slaughter
Posted on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 - 07:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I don't tend to use engine for braking but keep the gear selection matched to the speed I'm travelling. Kinda like if you need it, it's there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buckinfuell
Posted on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 - 07:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'd like to remind everyone here that every time you roll off the throttle, you are engine braking. Unless, of course, you pull the clutch every time you roll off, which would just be plain stupid. Engine breaking does not necessarily mean you are throwing the bike into a lower gear and bouncing the back tire around as you heave yourself over the tank...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rhun
Posted on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 - 02:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

per homecoming: The hardest thing on the belt is hard downshifts. I believe they were referring to the kind that makes your rear tire squeal or slide.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Freyke
Posted on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 - 03:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

three factors are in play in engine braking:

1. Engine Displacement
2. Comrpression Ratio

and finally and prob most inportant is...

3. Engine to drive wheel(s) reduction ratio (what gear are you in?)


Go from 5th to 2nd at 60mph and you will likely lock up the rear if you don't apply a whole lot of throttle.... garanteed..
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patrickh
Posted on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 - 04:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think of it like this. If you downshift an I4 from 4th to 3rd gear at 8,500rpm you will hardly feel any engine braking. If on the same bike you spin her up to 12,000rpm, where the bike is making near max power, and bang down a gear without matching revs you will get a good amount of engine braking. There are not a lot of riders who are clipping around at 10,000+ rpm on the street on their sport bikes...at least I don't hear it when they ride near me.

This is why a V-twin makes a terrific street bike. You can use a all of the motor's power more frequently because you don't need to wind up the engine to make max power, it always available to you at lower rpm's. Because you are always riding the bike "in it's power band" the effect of rolling off the throttle is more noticeable.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration