Author |
Message |
Fidel (Doncasto)
| Posted on Monday, November 06, 2000 - 05:08 pm: |
|
**Dealer Communication September 18, 2000*** Buell Motorcycle Company has learned that certain 2000 Buell motorcycles were built with a rear wheel sprocket that could break. This condition could cause the rider to lose power, lose control, or be struck by debris. Any of these occurrences could cause serious injury or death. This campaign involves all 2000 model year Blast P3 motorcycles produced between 3/3/1999 and 7/6/2000. We have voluntarily declared this a "defect related to motor vehicle safety" (Campaign 0822) to allow us to formally recall all potentially affected motorcycles. A bulletin containing details including parts availability will be mailed to you as soon as possible. In the interest of the safety of our mutual customers, and as required by law, you may sell but NOT DELIVER any affected motorcycles to your customers until the recall service has been performed. In accordance with Federal regulations administered by NHTSA all registered owners of affected vehicles will be notified by Buell Distribution Corporation of this condition and requested to bring the vehicle in for the recall service. Please note that this safety recall does not impact 2001 year model Blast. |
Ezblast
| Posted on Wednesday, December 31, 2003 - 05:28 pm: |
|
B - 041 2000 Late/Early 2001 Service Bulletin edited by ezblast on January 01, 2004 |
Ezblast
| Posted on Tuesday, March 09, 2004 - 12:34 pm: |
|
Just thought this should be here, although it applies to all Buells - in 2002 Buell went from the paper style rocker cover gasket to the cosmetic style/metalic - thus upgrading the ability of the gasket to not leak - lol GT - JBOTDS! EZ |
Sarodude
| Posted on Tuesday, March 09, 2004 - 02:30 pm: |
|
EZ- FWIW, I believe the rocker gasket change was made around September (don't quote me on the date) of 2002 which meant quite a number of 02 Blasts were made with paper gaskets - ours included. -Saro |
Joey
| Posted on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 - 09:15 am: |
|
Had my paper replaced with metal around 7K. I'm past 16K, and I have to pull the head off to get the exhaust studs removed. Do I need a new metal gasket if it looks OK? |
Gearheaderiko
| Posted on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 - 01:37 pm: |
|
Replace the gasket. Unless unavoidable, do not re-use any gaskets. Some gaskets, in a pinch, can be re-used, head gaskets almost never! |
Reepicheep
| Posted on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 - 03:06 pm: |
|
I might be tempted to reuse a metal primary gasket, but pulling the rocker boxes is a PITA. I would just get a new set and have peace. |
Sarodude
| Posted on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 - 04:38 pm: |
|
Ya know, when talking about re-use, it would be interesting to talk about use... -Saro |
Ezblast
| Posted on Tuesday, June 08, 2004 - 12:47 am: |
|
Usefull to check out if your in your primary case and own a 2000 or 2001. It seems the wrong nut got on some bikes in assembly - lol - so if your in there - its a good time to check! Got Thump?! Just Blasting on the Dark side! EZ |
Ezblast
| Posted on Friday, September 03, 2004 - 06:14 pm: |
|
2004 Recall notice - news message: A rollover vent valve on the 2004 Buell Blast motorcycle has to be replaced because investigators have discovered it might not be able to do the job for which it was designed. The valve is designed to allow air to replace fuel in the tank during operation. TRANSPORT CANADA says it can quit working, leaving the bike without a gasoline supply, thus starving the engine of fuel." From Canadian Press - not yet officially a Buell Blast Recall - Stay tuned! GT - JBOTDS! EZ |
Swampy
| Posted on Sunday, September 05, 2004 - 04:17 pm: |
|
EZ, whats it say? I can't open it. |
Ezblast
| Posted on Sunday, September 05, 2004 - 06:35 pm: |
|
B-043 1 of 1 ROUTING SERVICE MANAGER SALES MANAGER PARTS MANAGER LEAD TECHNICIAN TECHNICIAN NO. 1 TECHNICIAN NO. 2 TECHNICIAN NO. 3 TECHNICIAN NO. 4 RETURN THIS TO: INITIAL HERE ©2001 Buell Distribution Corporation Purpose The purpose of this bulletin is to notify dealers that some Buell motorcycles were produced with incorrectly manufactured engine sprocket nuts. The incorrectly manufactured nut has an interference fit which may result in a false torque reading. This can cause the nut to lose clamp load on the engine sprocket, allowing the sprocket and alternator rotor to loosen and create noise. Motorcycles Affected Late production 2000 and early production 2001 (5/15/2000- 6/15/2000) Buell X1, M2, S3 and P3. Required Dealer Action In the event that a customer complains of an unusual noise, start the motorcycle and inspect for a noise in the primary housing. If any unusual noise is heard in the primary housing, shut the motorcycle off, remove the primary cover and inspect the engine sprocket nut. NOTE See the applicable service manual for primary cover removal and replacement procedure. See Figure 1. A good, serviceable sprocket nut is shown on the left side of the figure. An incorrectly manufactured nut is shown on the right, identified by two arrow-shaped indentations on the face of the nut. NOTE If an affected motorcycle has been brought in for repair and the primary cover is removed, inspect the engine sprocket nut. Replace if it is determined to be an incorrectly manufactured nut. Credit Procedure After servicing each vehicle, file a warranty claim referencing Service Bulletin B-043 in the “Description of Repair” or “Comments” section of the claim. Fill in the rest of the claim as follows: * Use BMC if vehicle is still within factory warranty period; use BGW if vehicle is beyond factory warranty period. Vehicles beyond factory warranty period do not require prior authorization. If using h-dnet.com, put “Per Bulletin B-043 in the authorization box. Figure 1. Engine Sprocket Nut Indentations Correct Incorrect m1116-1 Claim Type BMC, BGW * Event 1 Qty 1 Problem Part No. 7839 Part Description Engine Sprocket Nut Primary Labor Code 4003 Time: 0.8 hr. Customer Concern Code 4104 Condition Code 3203 1 SERVICE BULLETIN B-043 September 10, 2001 ENGINE SPROCKET NUT The defective ones have a 'v' cut into the sides - you can open that with pdf software - free at their homepage - its used for books and documents - other stuff as well - Adobe Reader - look it up in any search engine and download it - NHRS Crossroads and others have their parts lists, etc. in pdf/Adobe - so its usefull to have - lol GT - JBOTDS! EZ |
Rockbiter1
| Posted on Monday, September 06, 2004 - 01:20 pm: |
|
had mine apart, i think mine was made 7/99 (or there abouts), and it has the correct nut. Yes, I CAN read, and i know this is a late 2000 and up problem, but it never hurts to check |
Jeb
| Posted on Tuesday, October 05, 2004 - 11:34 pm: |
|
Just to let you all know, it seems that Buell has improved the oil blow by situation with the '05 Blast. Mine puked out just under a half quart when I rode it hard right after passing the 500 mile break in point but it doesn't seem to have lost a drop since. |
Naustin
| Posted on Friday, October 08, 2004 - 02:08 pm: |
|
So how has the situation improved? My '03 has is only down a few ounces in the last 1100 miles. Did they actually re-engineer something; or are you just hoping you won't have to check the oil on your `05 between changes? |
Bhawk
| Posted on Friday, October 08, 2004 - 11:54 pm: |
|
At the risk of sounding GREEN,is there an after market carb that eliminates the autoenhance and replaces with a manual choke.Just fishin... |
Rockbiter1
| Posted on Saturday, October 09, 2004 - 02:07 am: |
|
the stock CV carb is the same one that HD uses on its big twins, but without the accelerator pump. The HD version uses a choke assembly, and does not have the throttle position sensor. while the Blast is modified for the automatic enrichener. changing between the two carbs is not physicly difficult, as long as you plan ahead (unlike me) and have a choke cable available, abd an aftermarket ignition to get around the HD version not having the throttle position sensor... these are not insurmountable, but will take some inginuety to implement. Here is a hint: the Blast carb has the capability to supply enough fuel for a big twin...so like i was told last week, changing carbs to get rid of an enrichener or to add an accelerator pump is hard to economicly justify. But it is fun to try! |
Ezblast
| Posted on Saturday, October 09, 2004 - 02:23 am: |
|
I added a Dial a jet - definate plus in carb response, but on the modified bike jetting took several dyno tries - to get leaner on the main - but its worked out great. HSR Mikuni 42 flat side is a performance choice used, I'm still thinking a 40mm Quick Silver Double pumper - as run in KTM's and other singles might be a good option as well. GT - JBOTDS! EZ (Message edited by ezblast on October 09, 2004) |
Jeb
| Posted on Saturday, October 09, 2004 - 07:09 am: |
|
Nope. Still checking the oil at every fuel stop. Its still a machine and still needs to be checked just like my car and the airplanes I work on. |
Gearheaderiko
| Posted on Monday, October 11, 2004 - 01:02 am: |
|
Bhawk: Adding to what Rockbiter said, changing carbs is more trouble than its worth. Unless you've made serious engine modifications, going to a different style (non-CV)carb wont gain you really anything (but trouble).The stock carb doesnt have any real problems either that would warrant the trouble and expense. PS Welcome to badweb! (Message edited by gearheaderiko on October 11, 2004) |
Jeb
| Posted on Thursday, October 14, 2004 - 09:26 pm: |
|
My engine sputters and hesitates a little bit if I crank the throttle quickly off of idle. Is this normal due to the tps setup or do I have a potential problem developing? The bike is stock and is currently in for its 1,000 mile service. It only has 875 miles on it but I can't ride at the moment due to a little injury suffered at work. |
Gearheaderiko
| Posted on Friday, October 15, 2004 - 09:12 pm: |
|
The Blast carb isnt built to go closed throttle to WFO in a snap of the wrist. It will tend to hesitate. BUT its more than likely doing this because: A. the bike isnt broken in yet. B. the gas is old and stale (you said you dont ride it much). C. Its not warmed up yet. Do feel free to mention any problems to the dealer while its under warranty. |
Jeb
| Posted on Friday, October 15, 2004 - 10:23 pm: |
|
Thanks Gearheader. I have a feeling its just me expecting too much. The bike runs fine otherwise. Well, when I remember to turn the fuel valve on. |
Bhawk
| Posted on Saturday, October 16, 2004 - 08:52 pm: |
|
Hey,preciate the info Rock,Gear......just stretchinthe brain muscles a little..... |
Bhawk
| Posted on Saturday, October 16, 2004 - 09:05 pm: |
|
P.S. Has anyone had any probs with the TPS on the blast? A quick history on her:got her with 278 m. on her this last late summer,shes a 2001,and she had set for about 2 yrs. but with a fuel stabilizer.Havin missing probs with her after a good warmup run just lately (2245 mi.)tested the tps and got a veeeery lo reading from jack #88 near tank/seat juncture on oil res.tube left side. .024 VDC book says should be .5 @ closed thrott. any hints? She runs OK till warm........ |
Ezblast
| Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 03:19 pm: |
|
NHTSA Campaign ID: 04V365000 Component: Fuel system, Gasoline Manufacturer: Buell Year: 2004 Make: Buell Model: Blast Recall Date: 07/23/2004 Potential Number of Units Affected: 656 Manufactured: Defect Summary: On certain motorcycles, the valve which was designed to allow air to replace fuel in the tank during operation could malfunction thereby starving the engine for fuel. Consequence Summary: This situation could cause the vehicle to shut down without warning, which could lead to a crash, causing the possibility of death or injury. Corrective Summary: Buell will replace the vent valve. The recall is expected to begin during August 2004. Owners should contact Buell at 414-343-8400. |
Jerzydevil
| Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 06:23 pm: |
|
Recall date:07/23/04 lol Better late than never} |
Ezblast
| Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 07:37 pm: |
|
The trick was finding a place where the recall was posted - finally found and posted - sorry for the untimeliness - GT - JBOTDS! EZ |
Jerzydevil
| Posted on Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 09:41 am: |
|
EZ I wasnt talking abt. you, I thought they just released it. sorry for the mix-up. |
Heckle
| Posted on Monday, May 23, 2005 - 05:06 pm: |
|
"Consequence Summary: This situation could cause the vehicle to shut down without warning, which could lead to a crash, causing the possibility of death or injury." Sounds like my "while going down a bumpy hill the engine shut off for no apparent reason". Except that I have a 2001! (Message edited by heckle on May 23, 2005) |
|