Author |
Message |
Ezblast
| Posted on Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 06:48 pm: |
|
http://www.motorcycle.com/specs/buell/standard/200 8/blast-reg/base.html How do they rate this? No complaints - just curious. EZ |
Ezblast
| Posted on Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 11:15 pm: |
|
LOL |
Sub65chris
| Posted on Friday, September 26, 2008 - 08:13 am: |
|
we all know the blast is number one thumper. |
Sub65chris
| Posted on Friday, September 26, 2008 - 08:13 am: |
|
untill xbp5sr3 comes out! |
Glitch
| Posted on Friday, September 26, 2008 - 09:59 am: |
|
Look at all the bikes under the Blast. |
Mikef5000
| Posted on Friday, September 26, 2008 - 10:23 am: |
|
So basically they just go by average consumer ratings. It doesn't matter if only one person has rated the bike, that's the number they're going with. Nice. |
Ezblast
| Posted on Friday, September 26, 2008 - 10:59 am: |
|
Then how did all those other bikes get on the list? I think there is a bit more to it than that or those bikes wouldn't be in that order - but for the life of me I can't figure what, unless it is also a combo of past test rides? Overall - I think it is funny, but it does show that the Blast was at least well thought of enough to get rated/reviewed in the first place - ahead of all those other great bikes - lol - and in Motorcycle.com no less. Blasts - like the rest of the Buell line - you either love them or hate them, but they definitely move you! EZ |
Rick_a
| Posted on Friday, September 26, 2008 - 08:16 pm: |
|
Weird list. |
|