Author |
Message |
Sci
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 06:28 pm: |
|
2006 XB12R D&D Muffler (sounds fantastic!) Open air box mod stock ecm and map All oils changed right before dyno (Screaming Eagle synth w/K&B lifetime oil filter) I havent pushed the custom map Al sent me with the direct link thru yet, but I cant imagine it would help that much (with the hp and torque will probably help the a/f). Its fat at the beginning and a little lean (15.7 at the highest point in the middle) then comes back down to where it needs to be at the end. I guess what I want to see is a stock dyno thats close to the temp and humidity if possible. I saw a stock one dyno at 94rwhp and 76lb ft on the same dyno (dynojet) but didnt see temp and humidity. And mine is at 81rwhp and 70lb ft???? (see dyno pic in the next post....) Evedently you just cant beat the stock setup performance wise (Message edited by sci on June 10, 2007) |
Sci
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 06:38 pm: |
|
I dont know how to load these damn pictures. But 13rwhp or so less and 7lb ft down. I gotta say its not worth the money I spent at all! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v510/scicom/06bu ellxb12r_dyno.jpg (Message edited by sci on June 10, 2007) |
No_rice
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 06:38 pm: |
|
}Evedently you just cant beat the stock setup performance wise why do you say that? that bike was putting out give or take ten more horse than any stock 12 i have seen dyno ever did. usually most i have seen were low 80's I havent pushed the custom map Al sent me with the direct link thru yet, but I cant imagine it would help that much (with the hp and torque will probably help the a/f) you what? why wouldnt it help? trust me when i say it will! or atleast it sure did on mine on the dyno that the exhaust shootout was done on, my 9r got about 93/4 horse and 73/4 pound foot of torque with my SS drummer put on it. that was ofcourse after 8/9 hours of direct link tuning with the help of the guys there. Al pushed making it to his plan to fly back home because he stayed to work on my bike so long trying to tweak it as good as he could (Message edited by no_rice on June 10, 2007) |
Sci
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:26 pm: |
|
why do you say that? that bike was putting out give or take ten more horse than any stock 12 i have seen dyno ever did. usually most i have seen were low 80's Thats what mine did with the D&D and open airbox mod -81hp 70lb ft why wouldnt it help? trust me when i say it will! or atleast it sure did on mine }I guess its possible those guys really didnt know what they were talking about at the Harley/Buell store I was at. That is who told me it wouldnt make that much difference} (Message edited by sci on June 10, 2007) |
Sci
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:31 pm: |
|
Im gonna push that remap Al sent me thru tomorrow or the next then I will take it back and see. Hopefully it will make that difference you are talking about. |
No_rice
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:31 pm: |
|
but you havent put the map in yet... mine was 74 horse with a D&D on it |
No_rice
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:37 pm: |
|
lol, thats a double jinx 6:38 and 8:31 yes it should make a decent difference, but the D&D is not really a BIG number pipe. it kind of drops on the bottom and top. has a nice kick at about 4500 though or atleast it did on mine. it may not make a huge numbers difference(i dont know the before tuning and after numbers on the same bike) but you sure should be able to feel how much better the bike runs after it has the right map in it. and now matter what anyone says, it isnt always about the peak horse and torque numbers. it is the whole curve that usually makes somthing good or not. (Message edited by no_rice on June 10, 2007) |
Sci
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:38 pm: |
|
but you havent put the map in yet... mine was 74 horse with a D&D on it Wow, I guess I will have to load it and see. So yours went from 74 (D&D and stock map) to 93? (w/D&D and custom map) I guess that one I saw bone stock at 94/76 wasnt a good example to go by if they are usually around low 80's.} |
No_rice
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:42 pm: |
|
no i also switched to a drummer SS and a new map at the same time, so that made a big difference also. |
Sci
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:42 pm: |
|
I never did a before (all stock dyno) I figured I wouldnt get an accurate reading being it wasnt gonna be the same day type thing. I guess I can always go by the track numbers (1/8 mile run a couple of weeks ago) at 7.66 @ 93mph (that was bone stock) |
Sci
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:45 pm: |
|
no i also switched to a drummer SS and a new map at the same time, so that made a big difference also. }Oooooh, guess you did say that already. I just liked the sound of the D&D and I gotta hellofa deal on it. |
No_rice
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 08:50 pm: |
|
it is a mean sounding pipe for sure. |
Rick_a
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 09:47 pm: |
|
The few I've seen at our shop are high 80's HP and low 70's TQ with exhaust, aircleaner, and race ecm. Unfortunately nobody has bothered to put a stock bike on our dyno yet. |
Beachbuell
| Posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 09:55 pm: |
|
My XB12R with a Buell Race kit registered with 88 horses and 78 torque at sea level in Florida. |
Sci
| Posted on Monday, June 11, 2007 - 12:19 am: |
|
Well then, I guess its not as bad as I had originally thought. Sounds like its about where it should be without the tune. Good to know. |