| Author |
Message |
    
Italialaw
| | Posted on Sunday, March 21, 2010 - 10:29 am: | 
|
Phelan,
Yes tried a force, KT was louder and performed better. Plus, KT's are rarer to find than a force.
The kooks was second best, but the fitment for pre-99 tubers didn't seem right, at least the two headers that I fitted on my 98' thunderbolt |
Guell
| | Posted on Sunday, March 21, 2010 - 04:36 pm: |
|
Thats why i put the kooks back on and wont sell it now |
Sa11977
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 - 03:11 pm: |
|
lol I have a Yoshimuri pipe I prefer loud. A wheelie is $1200 and the 3rd off is loose MC endorsment in FL |
Kalali
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 - 03:21 pm: |
|
Who makes the KT can? Not familiar with the brand.
Now let me ask a dumb question: So why not just put a straight 2.5" pipe instead of the exhaust altogether? |
Pkforbes87
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 - 04:55 pm: |
|
straight pipes leak a lot of metallic ringing sounds, "tinging", whatever you want to call it. My D&D is just a bombproof glasspack but I like the fact that it neutralizes some of those annoying high pitched frequencies before letting the deep, raspy exhaust note roar from the outlet  |
Skntpig
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 - 04:59 pm: |
|
The KT has a removable baffle. Mine is in runs and sounds great. KT pipes aren't made anymore but were made by.......KT |
Spiderman
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 - 05:16 pm: |
|
made by.......KT
Also known as Kendon Trailers.
If you ever need parts for said pipe they still have some in stock... |
Italialaw
| | Posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 - 07:51 pm: |
|
Any kt owners have a spare baffle that came with it originally? I have a couple of KT's but dont have the original baffles for them. Is there much of a difference in sound with and without the baffle? |
|
