| Author | Message | ||
     Whisperstealth |
For working to turn this forum into:  | ||
| Marksm |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHv2dIM3t9I | ||
| Tpehak |
| ||
| Blake |
We cannot claim to be on the side of truth and righteous justice if we allow other opinions to threaten our principles. | ||
| Whisperstealth |
What principles exactly? If Righteous Justice means allowing someone to tear down what has been built through years of work by many hands, I'll go ahead and slide on over to the side of Righteous Indignation and Disgust. | ||
| Aesquire |
It rather depends on the second order inclination of being a First Amendment Absolutionist. To be clear, I Want to know, or more specifically prefer to know than get blindsided, if my neighbor worships Baal, or supports Hamas. ( it would take too long to explain the minor difference ) If I know, I can watch if he pays excessive improper attention to the neighborhood children ( like Joe* ) or buys duct tape in bulk to keep in his windowless van. ( and I'm a vanner, so my interest is justified ) Or worse. Naturally as a law abiding Citizen, I would only follow legal and traditional actions if I had suspicions, like a letter to the local police. Nevermind my hobbies in medieval historical studies of technology like the use of lime, axes, and crossbows, that's Just intellectual curiosity! Really. | ||
| Aesquire |
Oh, and that same idealism fully supports your expressions of Righteous Indignation and Disgust. You do You! Have a nice day. I think I understand your view.  |
