Who's the guy in the photo? Also, no one ever said that The Wall would make us all safe again. Do you really think that you can convince anyone with your straw man arguments? Before you post things, type it in Word, read it, and ask, "what doesn't make sense here and how will it look silly to someone who isn't a "free stuff" voter?" Then revise as needed and copy and paste on Bad Web.
Your meme makes no sense, Julie. It's the typical emotionally pandering nonsense.
Thanks to fancy biased algorithms I get to read your daily propaganda on Google and social media. It's like backwardsland and bizzaro world every day for you guys.
The fact that progressive Democrats can openly endorse illegal immigration as a cheap labor source while simultaneously pandering to legal citizens with promises of artificially high minimum wages says it all.
I'm not sure about this shooter being associated with Antifa, but it seems that he often ranted about "stupid Christians" and his atheist beliefs. Sounds a bit like one of our own. I also read that he was a Hillary supporter, according to his FaceBook page, but I can't confirm this for certain. He certainly doesn't fit the mold for a conservative.
Why is it that the vast majority of these mass murderers are leftists? It sure helps explain them wearing Che t-shirts.
Let us be clear on one thing. There is zero evidence of a hack on the Democrat National Committee server. They refused to turn it over to law enforcement, specifically the FBI. The DNC hired a private company to announce the hack. The Famous Russian Hack has, unless the DNC releases the now undoubtedly scrubbed server to the FBI or police, only the word of paid political agents of the DNC aka Hillary's campaign, that it happened at all.
Julian Assuage claims that the leaks were an inside job, right after a pro-Bernie DNC staffer was assassinated on the street in what the DNC calls a "botched robbery". A botched robbery apparently is when someone walks up behind you in the street with nerves of Steele, plans the perfect moment with no witnesses or cameras, shoots you in the head, then walks on, not stopping to take anything obvious from the body. After all, if wallet, keys, and watch are untouched, there's no reason to suspect a USB drive is missing, right? ( sounds like a perfect assassination/robbery to me )
All other Russian interference in the election seems to be buying Facebook adds mostly against Donald after the election. ( if that is proof of guilt, CNN would be..... )
And of course the infamous meeting with Donald jr. Where the same people who helped create The Dossier, told the Donald campaign they had dirt on Clinton but actually were lobbying for Vladimir. He walked out when he found out they'd lied to see him.
The only known Russian collusion are the bribes to Obama and Hillary and the live mike plea from Obama, personally to the Russian President for Vladimir to delay any embarrassing action until after Obama was reelected.
Which he politely did. Holding off on invading Ukraine until after November.
Stories about fake news stories from an unreliable source. Includes partial picture previously posted and removed here.
So far there is no proof the shooter who was shot by an armed citizen and died was not on the payroll of Hillary. No proof he wasn't a Martian spy here for our women, and no proof he wasn't a time traveller driven mad by the time vortex.
And no proof he was.
We can look forward to more releases from his now scrubbed Facebook page. Even though Facebook took it down, anyone with a credit card can get copies from commercial hiring vetting services that store Facebook so employers can see the erased video of the beer bong rant about how evil his previous bosses are.
You may have to have an account. That would protect the company against lawsuits.
The point is the information is available if you want to pay for it. And 4chan nuts started saving pages before Facebook erased everything. ( including the murderer's rant how he was inspired by Facebook founder to kill god lovers.... something I just made up )
Looks like another killing spree by a crazy anit-Trump idiot has been avoided. This crazy put his thoughts out on YouTube, so you can try to follow his craziness. Clearly, he sees himself as a victim of pretty much everything. Then he talks of the merits of going out with a killing spree vs. just killing himself. The victim part is SOP for liberals. I wonder what percentage have similar killing spree fantasies?
Unhinged liberals are everywhere in this current political climate.
Thanks to obviously biased algorithms, I'm bombarded with liberal progressive socialist Democrat propaganda daily, and what is being relayed and how people react to it is crazy. It's backwardsland everywhere.
What is most telling, is that as far as political motives, if a violent act appears to further the progressive narrative it is sensationalized incessantly and immediately politicized. If it does not, it remains a local story, or the motives are unknown...the reasons are unclear.
On one hand you'll get a perpetrators life story by the next day. On the other, the perpetrators life story will be erased from every source possible and blatantly obscured.
I think any competent lawyer could successfully argue that this is an admission that their intent is to misuse the court system. They bought the land in order to have a court fight. That’s like buying a house next to an airport for the sole purpose of complaining about the noise.
Posted on Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - 03:44 pm:
There are non-legal ways to game that. Build the wall up to the edge of their property and have huge signs pointing at the gap that say in multiple languages, "trap". Build a border control facility next door with cameras and arrest crossers as they step beyond the property line.
Or if you're really mean, fence right around the property on the U.S. side and have the State Legislature tax such properties extra for revenue.
One of the criticisms of Trump is some instance of him getting a local government to condemn some private property so he could build a casino, maybe in Connecticut. I have the impression that in some states, pretty shallow justifications are allowed for the local governments to do this for private ventures if they can dream up some connection to "public good": more jobs, etc.
Every country is doing their best to establish permanent ghettos for the purposes of "empathy and compassion." It's the most ridiculous nonsense imaginable, and anyone who supports such policies has serious issues.
If only we could keep guns out of the hands of liberals. Crime would plummet. Perhaps the federal background check should include whether you’re a socialist.
We've got enough restrictions on gun ownership already, regardless of politics.
Felony past? I can see that. But start asking party affiliation and you open up a whole new can of worms that'll end up - I guarantee it - with more restrictions for EVERYONE. I'm a law-abiding conservative in the state of Maryland, and it's pretty much impossible for me to EVER get a carry permit, and it's hoops after hoops in order to even get approved to purchase a handgun. Long guns? Instant approval. Handgun? Um....no, not in this state, because of all the special interest loophole bullshit that you're talking about adding to with a "have you ever been a liberal" question. Count me out. If they're not a convicted felon, and they can be a responsible owner...go for it.
This guy...is NOT responsible, and deserves what he gets.
I agree. Should have not assumed the irony and sarcasm were obvious.
I'm pretty much full libertine on the subject. Equal rights, equal responsibility, I feel there is no reason to accept one more millimeter of restrictions and demand the repeal of unconstitutional laws.
The debate on rights is ongoing and important.
The notion that veterans are automatically PTSD and therefore are mentally ill, and therefore should be denied their rights is appalling.
A Religious or ethnic or political justification for violating your rights is specifically unconstitutional. Insert swear word here.