Author |
Message |
Ebutch
| Posted on Thursday, August 31, 2017 - 11:11 pm: |
|
|
Zac4mac
| Posted on Thursday, August 31, 2017 - 11:15 pm: |
|
Guess I picked a bad time to be an entrepreneur. It's OK, I'm armed too... |
Aesquire
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 03:59 am: |
|
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/31/splc-says-army-b ases-are-confederate-monuments-that-need-to-come-d own/ The Southern we want people to be in Poverty and violate the Law Center wants to close military bases "because they are Confederate Monuments". I'm not a fan of the J'accuse SPLC as I think they consider me a terrorist. They certainly love to lie about that sort of thing. They'd love me if I was a rapist named Mohammed, but hate me because I don't like rapists no matter what their name is, but importing one named Mohammed because he belongs to a pre-medieval death cult and that makes him better than me, annoys me. I suppose If I told them I wasn't Christian then I'd get a pass. If I lied and told them Lenin was my hero, they'd offer me a job. In any event, not a fan. http://freebeacon.com/issues/southern-poverty-law- center-transfers-millions-in-cash-to-offshore-enti ties/ But I do admit they do rake in millions from useful idiots and are quite effective at lying about Americans. I do wonder a little bit where the leadership lives. I look forward to the lawsuits. |
Hootowl
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 04:25 pm: |
|
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/01/emergency-abo rtion-fund-established-for-harvey-victims.html “All people deserve the rights and resources they need to live safely, freely, and with dignity and support,” You know, unless you're a helpless baby. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 04:52 pm: |
|
http://www.weeklystandard.com/a-beating-in-berkele y/article/2009498 There are good guys. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 05:06 pm: |
|
Hoot, you don't seem to be with the Program. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/01 /exclusive-dsouza-the-hitler-sanger-connection/ That's not a helpless baby, that's a strain on the limited resources of Gaia. ( ironic if you are aware of r/K selection theory ) That's of course, the modern excuse. The old ones still apply if you're in the White Supremacy Democrat Party. Unfit, Lesser Breeds, Undesirable, etc. In numbers, the greatest non-violent genocide in history. But of course, that history is to be erased. |
Hootowl
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 06:19 pm: |
|
If you consider dismembering someone before crushing their skull non violent... |
Aesquire
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 06:26 pm: |
|
I mean it was voluntary instead of mobs of machete wielding tribesman. Or armed men herding folk onto trains to death camps. Or deliberately starving people to death while shooting them if they try to leave. That's pretty non-violent. Except for the victims. But Victim-hood is relative for these people. Aborted babys? Raped by immigrants women? Murdered Police? not Victims. Saw a statue? Heard a different opinion? Got told the truth? AH! There's the Victims! |
Ebutch
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 06:33 pm: |
|
|
Aesquire
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 06:42 pm: |
|
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/09/01/southern-p overty-law-center-our-aim-in-life-is-to-destroy-th ese-groups-completely/ |
Aesquire
| Posted on Friday, September 01, 2017 - 08:43 pm: |
|
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/08/31/scam-linda -sarsour-fundraising-harvey-hurricane-relief-fund- goes-left-wing-activist-group/ So, does this go in the Democrats cheat hurricane survivors, or Islamic propaganda leader cheats hurricane survivors? Or the Acorn under a new name cheats hurricane survivors? All of the above, in fact, are true. I'm sure the defense against this crime from the Propaganda gal is "not my fault, not my PAC, I never take blame or responsibility for my actions, so you must be racist". |
H0gwash
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 11:57 am: |
|
Are Texans okay with giving away some of their own federal disaster relief funds to partially fund a Mexico border wall? I'm thinking that would be a terrible investment but it's not my disaster relief fund to give away. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 12:37 pm: |
|
That would depend if they were low to medium income Texans who are being screwed by cheap illegal labor, Texans in the line of fire from the drug gangs & trespassers near the border and along the smuggling routes, or rich Texans who like cheap labor for their sweat shops and yard work. |
Sifo
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 02:50 pm: |
|
Why in the world should the idea even come into one's head, that ANY state should have to give up money for a natural disaster, to fund one of the few things that our federal government is mandated to do. That would be border control. Border control is for the entire nation. It has nothing whatsoever to do with recovery from a hurricane. I can't for the life of me understand why someone would make that connection, other than petty politics. Very sad during such a serious disaster. |
H0gwash
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 03:06 pm: |
|
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/30/gop-eyeing-1-billi on-disaster-funds-cut-to-help-wall.html There does not seem to be a Fox News version of this story, so maybe it was leaked and spun and it never actually happened.
|
H0gwash
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 03:14 pm: |
|
I strongly support states' refusal to fund traditionally federal responsibilities such as immigration. |
Sifo
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 03:56 pm: |
|
There does not seem to be a Fox News version of this story, so maybe it was leaked and spun and it never actually happened. If you read the article, not even a different one, but the one attached to that headline... You will see the headline is basically the fake news that we complain about. The spending cuts have nothing to do with Harvey relief. Relief for natural disasters has never been a line item in our budget. Bad on NBC for trying to mislead the public. I strongly support states' refusal to fund traditionally federal responsibilities such as immigration. Aside from the fact that a state can't simply do that, why would you be against enforcing our borders? Do you know of any other nations that don't enforce their borders? I'd like to hear of an example. |
Sifo
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 04:10 pm: |
|
Just damn!!! Public School Teachers Behind Violent Antifa Group |
H0gwash
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 04:51 pm: |
|
FWIW the story is Associated Press, written by Alan Fram and Andrew Taylor. At least they gave their names if not the name of their source. I would support tax increases to provide for better immigration control for all our borders. It seems that a physical wall on just the Mexico side is not cost effective even among moderate republicans. |
Sifo
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 05:37 pm: |
|
FWIW the story is Associated Press, written by Alan Fram and Andrew Taylor. At least they gave their names if not the name of their source. Like I said, the headline is essentially fake news. Shame on NBC. So they took a story from the AP and put a bogus headline on it. The headline, which is all most people will read, is 100% fake news. I would support tax increases to provide for better immigration control for all our borders. It seems that a physical wall on just the Mexico side is not cost effective even among moderate republicans. Well that's pretty much the polar opposite of supporting states not paying their share to fund immigration control. As for a wall... In many areas, a wall makes perfect sense as a part of border control. Other areas, not so much. Design of the wall matters too. Anyone claiming a wall will fail to work is ignoring history. Cost effective? Again, there are many factors at play there. Portions of a wall have already been constructed during the Bush Jr. years. Those areas have proven to work well, doing a far better job than other efforts in those areas. I'm not sure how you rate cost effectiveness when comparing something that failed, to something that worked. Personally, I'm not a fan of the idea of a single wall along the entire border. I know it will never happen. There are far too many problems with the idea. Cost is not that high on the list of problems IMO. "Build the wall" is just a bumper sticker slogan. It should be take as such. The issue is border enforcement. I do support that. I also support controlled, legal immigration. So does Trump, if you take him at his word. Not really sure where you stand on border control. |
Ebutch
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 09:45 pm: |
|
|
Hootowl
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 10:11 pm: |
|
It's exceedingly unlikely that he was a member of the SS. He had to have been 10 years old at the time. |
Ebutch
| Posted on Saturday, September 02, 2017 - 11:10 pm: |
|
born 1930 still EVIL ! |
Aesquire
| Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2017 - 12:50 am: |
|
Soros was forced into service. The "collect valuables" part is bogus. Lie. His fond memories of serving as a Gestapo informant and spy against his fellow Jews? True. He now claims to have protected his fellows, but there is no evidence of that. Hungary was invaded from both sides. The Soviets and the Nazis. The bad blood is still a factor there. Some embraced the Reds to fight the Germans, others fought with the Germans against the Soviets. Heroes and villains on both sides. Jew hating scrum on both. I lack the perspective to shorten a complex history to slogans that aren't meaningless to most Americans. It's a dark and bloody time. Excessive doesn't touch the atrocities. After the Great Patriotic War the Soviets again invaded. Where exactly Soros fits on a scale of evil is hard for me to say. I'm biased. He strives to turn America into a Soviet state and profits from other's misfortune by manipulating currency and cashing in on ruined economies. The Russian Ruble and English Pound both were trashed by him. And he made out well enough to spend millions formenting hate and fascism, or communism, around the world. Whichever makes him richer. He recently crashed the Gold market by dumping fourteen tons, troy, onto the market and made more profit than most countries produce in years. That's how powerful and evil he is. That's why Hungary would love to hang him and is fighting his paid revolution. |
H0gwash
| Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2017 - 02:33 am: |
|
The headline, which is all most people will read, is 100% fake news. You are right- this particular headline is the outlier. Border protection wise- it would be nice to make the current patchwork of walls and border stuff into something cohesive at an affordable cost. I think Trump is aiming unreasonably high for his wall. |
Oddball
| Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2017 - 12:32 pm: |
|
The "wall" should be a surveillance net. A Chain Home system if you will. All invaders detected and intercepted efficiently. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2017 - 01:45 pm: |
|
For years I have said we should train troops at the Mexican border. Not so much to arrest trespassers as to train for modern war. The troops would be partnered with Border Patrol agents who would do the arrests and advise on local conditions. The Real reason is that since Korea we have foolishly permitted the enemy to slip across a border for sanctuary from attack. Insanity. Politicians learned nothing from Vietnam, which was won here by sponsored Soviet stooges. Afghanistan and Iraq are worse than 'Nam. Pakistan, Iran & Syria protect and aids terrorists to attack the U.S. My advice to Bush would have been to focus forces on border protection and eliminate the bad guys far from cities. Better would have been to hammer Iran for hostile action and turned it over to the U.N. for occupation and free election. Syria would have been a negotiation with Russia. So border strategy would have applied there. Pakistan is a tough one. Saturation bombing is tempting but immoral. If, as expected, they refused to stop sheltering the Taliban, we should give India Kashmir and stop all aid to the Pakistani while chasing the Taliban to the sea if need be. But the political situation with pandering leftist traitors makes sane strategy very difficult. Thus border control training for the military. Preserving Posse Comitatus. Of course I also suggest dropping politicians on the enemy like medieval days with bodies thrown over the walls of the cities under siege with catapults. Just use cargo planes instead. No chutes. Just demoralizing splits. Aim Pelosi at that square in Tehran where they behead people. |
Ebutch
| Posted on Sunday, September 03, 2017 - 03:11 pm: |
|
|
Ebutch
| Posted on Monday, September 04, 2017 - 06:27 pm: |
|
|
Ebutch
| Posted on Monday, September 04, 2017 - 06:29 pm: |
|
|
|