is that where you're going to leave the forward grip? have you tried shooting with a pistol grip as far forward on the rail as possible? for most people, the closer your hand is to the front of the barrel, the more control you have, especially while shooting and moving at the same time. is that a 10"?
It's a 7." That's where it feels right to me. The balance point is just in front of the mag well. I'll use a forward grip for quick transitions with a 16" plus barreled gun. For the short stuff it doesn't make a difference to me.
I need another upper to go with the RRA lower I have. Bought all Magpul pink furniture to dress it up for the girls, they have no idea I'm building it. Still deciding on which upper to go with though.
Dean, Guy in the gun store tried to show my wife a pink gun last week. He's lucky she didn't puke on his counter. She can't stand pink guns. Ritt dye will probably fix those. I've had success with it in the past.
The "extra grooves and holes" on aluminum free float tubes/quad rails are to maximize grip, lighten weight and dissipate heat. In this case the forend was used as a platform for the AFG, to maximize the sight radius, and allowing the use of a flip up front sight.
Modern AR's in military service use KAC and DD rails. I doubt fashion is the primary reason for their use.
Heck, even the standard hand guards are full of holes on the tops and bottoms and grooves along the rest.
But hey, if you don't like it just say so
It's not built for show. The entire premise was a non-NFA, affordable PDW-style weapon using common parts.
I go to the range with my guns carried on my back. This is much more transportable than any other rifle caliber firearm I have. With a 22lr conversion I can also do some back yard shooting. Being classified as a pistol also opens up other options compared to long guns in regards to use/transportation.
If it works for you, then great! I just keep getting stuck on the idea of building a pistol with that buffer tube hanging out the back. It just seems awkward to me. Perhaps I might be able to see the light if you could arrange for me to shoot a bunch of rounds with Honey Badger selected though.
Rick, Being totally serious here, what is it that you like most about this build over what could be purchased as an over the counter pistol? Is it just fun factor of the build? The idea of a .223 round in a self defense pistol? Do you see the buffer tube as a positive or negative thing? I'm still trying to get my head wrapped around this gun.
I've also been thinking about .223 as a primary home defense round. The more I look at it, the more I like many attributes with the correct ammo.
I've been itching for an AR pistol for a while. I wonder if I could do a piston AR15 pistol so I don't have to deal with the buffer tube. I have an unbuilt lower sitting around.
I almost pulled the trigger on a Daniel Defense AR this week and swung some side work for a family friend who's going to trade me a nice AR to replace the engine in his truck. 'Free' AR!
What I like about the AR pistol configuration with a pistol buffer tube is the flexibility.
Here's an example of how they can be utilized:
This is mainly for fun/range/backyard use. It can be used in a more serious role but bullet selection is critical as standard ammunition will not fragment at such low velocities. Some types of expanding ammo will still work well.
I actually built this one in a 10.5" barrel specifically for home use:
What I get out of building is configurations exactly as I want them with a few hundred dollars saved.
These can be built without the buffer tube, but there aren't many uppers that allow it. The fact that the buffer tube is integral to the design is part of the appeal. It's another point of contact aiding in a stable hold.
I don't doubt the utility of the buffer tube. I've shot a few AR pistols and definitely see the value of them as a PDW for things that go bump in the night, or even as a car gun. In Ohio, I can't keep a loaded rifle in the car, but I can keep a loaded pistol with my CCW, the AR pistol is the perfect solution for this.
Thanks for the reply. I don't see that as my cup-o-tea. I can see a niche purpose or two though.
Ammo selection critical? In a huge way. I was wondering about that exact thing of bullets fragmenting from that short of a barrel. I'm sure it's going to be hard to find data for that configuration. I've been looking at 9mm data for various rounds lately for my new XDs pistol. I've seen data where the same tester tests the same ammo, once from a 5 inch barrel, and once from a 3 inch barrel. The ammo performed great from the 5 inch. As you would expect, it was slower with the 3 inch barrel. That caused it to not expand and greatly over penetrate. That kind of over penetration may not be what might be expected from a slower bullet. Seems pretty critical for a CCW gun IMO though. I may have to do some testing of my own this summer with my own guns and drywall to really make up my mind. I am thinking that the right .223 ammo might suit me better than my 9mm. I'm considering factors beyond the ammo too, but ammo is a big part of the equation. It's got to be an entire system.
BTW, I was also wondering if the light weight varmint rounds would be fast enough from that short barrel to cause the bullet to fragment when going through drywall. I'm not sure about the terminal ballistics though.
Take a little looksee at the FNH PS 90 that may be what you are looking for, shoots a 40 jacketed hallow point at around 2000 FPS, Has a 50 round magazine for Zombies and if fully ambidextrious without changing anything. The 57 pistol made by FNH holds 20 rounds and fires the same bullet. Guaranteed no one in the neighborhood will have one like it.
I'm not sure why you want a bullet to fragment in this context. To reduce penetration on interior walls?
Media testing is useful for rule of thumb.
Real world results are all over the place because humans/deer/Kudu are not uniform. Bones, wildly different densities of flesh, it's not completely predictable. But I'm sure you know & just have to accept that.
The Box-O-Truth guys use gallon milk jugs of water and have a fairly well calibrated adjustment factor. So you can just duplicate their rig and get pretty close results. Besides, it's fun. Splashy loud fun. Line up 5-6 water jugs and drape the first with denim & a towel.
Current accepted/fad specs are 12 inches minimum through standard ballistic gel. FBI specs call for penetration & expansion after penetrating a barrier ( glass or plywood or metal ) etc. etc. ( better yet, read the "buick of truth" section for shooting up a car. )
If you want to limit penetration then you have to accept the possibility of not reaching the center of a 200+ lb. critter.
In 9mm I really like Federal's Guard Dog. ( formerly Expanding Full Metal jacket ) It comes in a LE only version with more penetration or a civilian with less, by tweaking the jacket scoring & thickness. ( I think they have this one figured out )
It doesn't give a damn what it hits, it's going to expand in the same way. It doesn't use the "hydraulic" effect of a hollow point passing through fluid, but instead is completely mechanical with a pre-scored jacket and a ( food safe ) silicon ball in the nose with lead behind. Walls, glass, wood, metal, Tiger, all the same.
Civilian version averages about 10-11 inches in ballistic gel.
I consider it nearly perfect for crowded areas where overpenetration is not an option. Schools, home, apt. buildings, etc.
Hornady has it's Critical Defense loads that use a polymer tipped hollow point that also seems uber consistent in performance. Hornady has polymer tips figured out.
There may be (and will be) other loads that don't have the issue Sifo ( properly ) complains of. Ammo tech has really improved. From last month.
In .223, I have less experience, as I usually shoot OTM match rounds. I suspect that decent 55gr polymer tipped varmint bullets might work well in a shorter barrel, while with a long barrel it would probably fragment.
Are any of the Ammo companies making a short barrel specific .223 round? Like Speer does for snub nosed .38's?
My opinion on the "grooves & holes" issue is that Rick_a's hand guard is functional, with minimum "catch on branches" protrusions. Front sight, ( unavoidable ) and front grip, ( gotta try one of those ) pretty clean. Full top rail, a gotta have for optic choices.
The holes are an engineering vs. artistic issue, and..... Taste is Taste. Functionally the holes vent & the ribbing gives you non snag grip. Industrial Chic.
The rest of the parts? Like the optic. nice grip. Good Build.
I don't want to jump the gun here as I don't have the info all in front of me. But I've been made aware of some tests that the feds have been doing on 5.56 ballistics. Apparently they have been shooting through windshields into ballistic gelatin, measuring penetration depth and weight retention of the projectile. They were shot through 8" AR's, I'll leave the mfg nameless for now. I should be able to get the info on the top 3 performers.
On a side note I also found out that the security detail attached to Attorney General, Eric Holder, carries 8" LWRC PSD's in 5.56, as it serves their needs for their range of engagements. Oops. Anyway assuming I can get the rest of the info soon I'll keep you posted. I thought it was pretty interesting.
Here is the 5.56 info as I have it. If I can get more I will but this is the short and skinny. I should be able to get more detailed info I just don't know when.
50 Yards with an LWRCI 8” PSD Through 10% Bare Ballistics Gelatin
100 Yards with an LWRCI 8” PSD Through 10% Bare Ballistics Gelatin Two best performers were;
SSA Barnes TSX Brown Tip 45 gr Solid Copper Rounds
Penetration: 16.8” Expansion: 0.34” Retained Wt: 45 gr
Spear Gold Dot 64 gr
Penetration: 16.2” Expansion: .45” Retained Wt: 61 gr
Best performers overall through an anti-spall windshield into gel.
Federal Tactical Bonded 55 gr.
Penetration: 11.5” Expansion: .43” Retained Wt: 55 gr
10" and longer barrels work fine at very close ranges (within 50 yards) with most anything. They all need more specialized stuff depending on desired distances and needs.