G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archive through May 02, 2015 » Second Amendment » Archive through July 18, 2013 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Wednesday, July 03, 2013 - 11:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1ABw6IMKn0
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Wednesday, July 03, 2013 - 01:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

(A) At least he kept it pointed a safe direction... so by following rule 3 he didn't die (this time) for ignoring rule 1 and 2.
(B) Why on earth, after doing that, would he post it on YouTube?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pdxs3t
Posted on Thursday, July 04, 2013 - 12:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

What a moron!

He should have all firearms taken from him. And what's really stupid, he posted it on youtube.com!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Thursday, July 04, 2013 - 12:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

He should have all firearms taken from him.

I disagree, with this point only, he has to fix the celing and the roof,
He has to explain to the land lord and family what happened,
If he lived in my home, I would have confiscated his collection and locked it up for as long as he lived with me.
( I would have to be present to enforce the safety rules or he could live else where, the guns would still be his )

He just had a cheap lesson ( no one got hurt AFAWK)

If he lives in an apartment I will bet he will be asked to move out.

He may be subject to fines or confiscation if he discharged the weapon in a city limit.

I got idiot before the gun went off I bet you did too.

I guess the gun owner safety rules
should also include

Recheck your weapon and script before shooting a video....

never disclose what you have in the way of weapons ( not nsa safe )

I expect some form of federal confiscation attempt in my life time.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Friday, July 05, 2013 - 04:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Deaths by Carry Permit Holders - not as many as the grabbers claim:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id =2095754

This indicates that shall-issue laws at worst are responsible for 0.24 murders per 100,000 concealed weapon licensees per year since May of 2007, or 4.6% per cent of the average U.S. murder rate of 5.23/100,000 people for the years 2007 through 2010.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Friday, July 05, 2013 - 08:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

There's a direct corelation between freedom and crime. More freedom, less crime.

More CCW permits, less crime.

Free states, less crime.

Highest murder rates are in places where citizens are restricted from free gun ownership. Chicago, NYC, etc.

Most suicide by massacre crimes are in "gun free zones".

Most such have happened since 1973. The early 70's were the era where the "desconstructionist" movement took hold in public schools after a time of indoctrination in colleges. Moral relativism, the destruction of history and it's replacement with propaganda. ( we spent 4 weeks on the labor movement in High School, 2 days on the American Revolution. )

Thats does NOT mean that there are zero crimes and zero murders in places that allow open carry. Just much less. Humans are imperfect.

Best book I know of on subject.

http://www.amazon.com/More-Guns-Less-Crime-Underst anding/dp/0226493644

Trying to find the name of the reporter who went to soCal beaches and asked this question.

"If we had tougher gun control laws, would that have prevented Lee Harvey Oswald from shooting Jesus?" ( the answers were scary..... )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Doubled
Posted on Friday, July 05, 2013 - 10:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

You're looking for Mark Dice:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Friday, July 05, 2013 - 11:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Voters, every one.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Saturday, July 06, 2013 - 08:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Violence Policy Center’s Concealed Carry Killers: Less Than It Appears
Clayton E. Cramer1
The Violence Policy Center maintains a website titled CONCEALED CARRY KILLERS as part of their effort to show that many Americans who receive licenses under the increasingly popular ―shall-issue‖ concealed license laws are not only disreputable figures, but a threat to public safety. This list included, as of May 12, 2012, a total of 374 deaths—and at first glance, it is quite disturbing. (Unaccountably, the primary web page listed these as 12 law enforcement deaths and 228 civilian deaths, although perhaps they simply neglected to recalculate based on the data they had.)2
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the incidents, finding that many are incorrectly described. A few of the criminal cases have been settled in favor of the accused. Some are criminal cases that are still pending. Many of the incidents are single suicides, which while sad, are not criminal matters or public safety concerns, nor relevant to may-issue vs. shall-issue concealed carry licensing. A number involve situations where possession of a concealed weapon license is completely irrelevant to the tragedy that unfolded. In some cases, these incidents involve licenses issued in ―may-issue‖ states, and licensees who are retired police officers, who are almost always issued such licenses even in the strictest of ―may-issue‖ jurisdictions.


From http://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=5410210 02118115125084103082020093089109025032011016032119 08410107609610302506508210600106010200504111101811 61000750880801221240420340070760001040660950931170 07003064064019111096119117097098121004084067&EXT=p df
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Saturday, July 06, 2013 - 10:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Thanks Doubled!

Blake, By any means necessary.

Arrest a child for saying the word Gun.

It's a full court press propaganda effort.

( insert incest reference here ) are evil.

Can't make slaves out of armed men. That's the bottom line for these folk. Truth matters not, facts matter not. Power is all. And they want it all.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 06:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Regarding the full court press angle, in a news story yesterday about the wife of Nelson Mandela, it said that she had been a trained guerrilla fighter in her country (not South Africa). Their breathless example of her training was that she was trained to dismantle and reassemble an ASSAULT RIFLE. OMG that just shows how elite she was.

I still like the line that for all the military-style weapon hysteria, it would be treason to saddle our troops with the scary semi-auto assault rifle that Lanza used in CT.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 08:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"semi-auto assault rifle" is not an oxymoron, it's a deliberate lie. Does. Not. Exist.

I was under the impression that the CT massacre-suicide nut used a Bushmaster AR clone? Or not? There is considerable lack of credibility in the conflicting reports re: type and use of weapons in that horror.

But... assuming he used a Bushmaster M4 or A2 clone, why would it be treason to "saddle our troops" with one? Yes, it is not capable of full auto fire, ( one of the definitions of an actual "assault rifle" as defined by real weapons experts, in the real world, not by liars trying to destroy your civil rights ) Yes, it's not made by Colt, and may not have mil spec buffer tube, etc. but it's a perfectly serviceable rifle.

Please explain?

Back before many of you were born, the US Army wanted to increase the firepower of the classic M1 Garand semi-auto Battle Rifle, and replace the heavy ( about 20 lbs ) BAR by combining the functions in one rifle, the M14. Previous squad level tactics, since WW1, had one man carry the BAR ( Browning Automatic Rifle ) a magazine fed machine gun, ( automatic Rifleman ) for heavy firepower while the bulk of the team had rifles. The concept of the M14 was that every squad member would then have the same capacity, greatly increasing the lethality and flexibility of a Squad. ( a sub-platoon group of soldiers, normally the smallest unit deployed in isolation )

Unfortunately it turns out the 7.62 x 51 round out of a lighter rifle is darn hard to control in machine gun mode. Not impossible, but the M14 lacked the mass of the old BAR and required physical strength and a different technique to fire effectively full auto. The adoption by the Soviet Union of a true Assault Rifle, the AK-47, led, through oddball and round about ways, to the adoption of the M16. A selective fire ( full auto like a machine gun or semi-auto like a rifle ) rifle using a lower than "normal" powered cartridge than a Battle Rifle. A true Assault rifle.

The Battle Rifles of WW1-2 & cold war, used high powered cartridges considered adequate for big game hunting, the 30-06, 6.5mm/7mm/7.92mm ( 8mm ) Mauser, .303 British ( originally a cordite filled cartridge ) 6.5mm/7.7mm Arisaka, 7.62 x 54R Russian, etc. Almost all were also used in machine guns, and all kick too hard to be used in a very light machine gun as a replacement for the Battle Rifle. ( the idea of the M14 )

The Germans in WW2 developed a shortened version of the 7.92x57 ( 8x57 ) Mauser, the 7.92x33 Kurz ( short ) used in the "machine pistol" or "machine carbine" later named for scary propaganda purposes the Sturmgewehr44 & 45. The "Storm rifle" or "Assault Rifle".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.92%C3%9757mm_Mauser

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.92%C3%9733mm_Kurz

The Soviet Union copied the concept and created a short version of their 7.62x54R, the 7.62x39. Used in Carbines and then the Ubiquitous AK-47 ( designed in part by Hugo Schmeiser, captured by the Soviets and put to forced labor ) following the German definition of "assault Rifle" and making it the norm for more than half the armies on the planet.

The U.S., on the other hand had no such rational transition. The M14 was often modified to lock out the full auto capacity and used as a Battle Rifle. The M16 was purchased by the US Air Force as a "high tech" weapon for those guarding our Nuclear Arsenal & Bombers. Only later did it become the standard Army weapon, and after some serious glitches ( caused by the Army's decisions on equipment & ammo, not the gun's design ) has served well for over 50 years.

Unlike the Germans & Russians, the U.S. went from a battle rifle cartridge the 7.62x51 to a much lighter, completely unrelated round, the 5.56x45, based on a "varmint" hunting round.

There is, was, and always will be argument that the 5.56 is not good enough, not powerful enough, and there is some justification for those arguments. I do note that we've had those arguments before, as when people complained that the newfangled .30 Krag round just wasn't as good as the old .45-70 govt............................... and of course long before that when they complained that the new fangled Arrows just didn't have the stopping power on cave bear and mammoth that a good old spear does.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pwnzor
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 09:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

No rifle was used in Connecticut.

It was in the trunk of the car.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slaughter
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 09:33 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

We have to be careful when attempting to use "facts" when they turn out to not be truthful.

Initial reports from Newtown which stated that the Bushmaster rifle was left in the trunk never from a known authority and only add to the hysteria on both sides. Lanza's only pistol shot was the one he used to commit suicide.

The weapon left in the trunk was a shotgun which was mis-reported early on by the media as the Bushmaster AR15.

I'm also guilty of "wanting to hear" something other than what had actually happened.

Repeating it again won't make it suddenly true.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

D_adams
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 09:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The rifle in the trunk of the car was a shotgun, so where they got the "AR-style, assult style" weapon on the news from, I have no clue. No, I wasn't there, but I did see some of the live helicopter footage when they pulled that one out of the trunk. Guy wasn't wearing any gloves (prints anyone?) and I doubt it really followed any serious chain of custody. Initial reports varied WILDLY from one minute to the next, but it's hard to refute what you see live.

Follow that with children that were "killed" but showed up later at the white house? Parents that were really (_proven_ to be) actors? Cover-up? Yep. Lies? Yep. Guy in the woods that "wasn't" there? Hmmm. Wonder where he ended up going anyway?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 10:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'd love to see that resume.

"Commercial for hemmeroid cream"
"Hand model for latex-free glove"
"Shill for Presidential Propaganda campaign against Civil rights"
"Third Slacker from left in Indie Film on Gen X"
"Fluffer for gay porn film"
"Shakespeare In The Park, Calgary"

With this administration, it's increasingly hard to tell the BS consipracy theories from fact.

"Birth Certificate" that's a multi layer PDF file?
Program to ship guns to Mexican Drug gangs to increase murder rate to make Presidential lie seem true.
Blame AQ attacks in 23 cities on youtube video, Have Sec State tell relatives that you intend to arrest "film maker", do so on tv, endangering life of film maker deliberately.
Closeted Gay lifestyle concealed by murder and threats.
College financial & academic records "sealed", ( fact ) to ( speculatively ) conceal "foreign student" status and sponsorship by Saudi Arabia?
Claims of being a Kenyan Born First "black" Harvard Law Review Pres. ( from Obama's publisher's bio )
Being Pres. of Harvard Law Review and never having a Law Review published?
Promise to not take your guns.
http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/f lashback-obama-i-will-not-take-your-guns-away

Can YOU tell the factual from the false in the above list?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

D_adams
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 10:20 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

And when they come to take them, they'll have to kill me to get them. As Mr. Heston once said 'From my cold, dead hands!'
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 11:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Who is 'unfit' to own guns ?
Seen the new DSM 5 ?
You are ALL crazy until proven otherwise.... and what does that take, a MANDATORY visit to a state approved and paid physician that has accepted CMS/HHS Obamacare payment and reimbursement.

Wet your bed when you were a kid .... goodbye gun.
As a vet, get back from the deployment with nightmares - goodby gun
get back from war and NOT have sought approved counselling - threat to society.

when they own the rules - they can write them any f'n way they want
Comply, Obey, stay dumb, fat, docile - it is every tryants' wet dream
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 11:40 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Steve,

I decided to not interrupt the ongoing thread here. Started new thread for the cowardly store discussion...

http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/messages/406 2/716381.html?1373211475

Moved your post there too.

(Message edited by blake on July 07, 2013)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slaughter
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 02:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Good call, Blake. Thanks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 05:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Aesquire -

The MSM mostly wants to call what we call a modern sporting rifle a "military style " weapon. I was trying to point out their (willful?) ignorance by saying that it would be bad to take away the full auto capable M-16s and M-4s from our troops and give them mere semi-auto rifles. I think we agree and maybe my original sentence wasn't as clear as I would like.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, July 07, 2013 - 11:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Gotcha. Thanks.

I do harp on about actual facts vs. the deliberate misrepresentations....

It's the prejudice against Black Rifles that annoys me. Typical of certain folk, eh?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Thursday, July 11, 2013 - 12:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Birds of a feather....

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/07/10 /Rahm-Emanuel-Using-Backdoor-Measures-To-Guarantee -Concealed-Carry-Fail-In-Chicago?utm_source=conten tsharing&utm_medium=linkexchange&utm_term=postion5 &utm_content=Rahm-Emanuel-Using-Backdoor-Measures- To-Guarantee-Concealed-Carry-Fail-In-Chicago&utm_c ampaign=foxnews
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, July 11, 2013 - 12:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The Illinois carry laws are going to be a legal landmine. They got a delay in the ruling on implementation of the law and used to pass a bunch of local restrictions that are creating an insane patchwork of local laws that guarantee that you will never know when you are in violation of the law as you drive from one town/county to the next. Yes, technically there will be concealed carry. In practical terms, it's a mess.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, July 11, 2013 - 01:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I just got this email from the Illinois State Rifle Association. I wish I understood the details of all that is going on, but I'm lacking both the time and legal expertise to keep abreast of what's going on in my own state...

Emphasis added by me.


quote:

ISRA Special Alert



Members,

On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Southern District, Benton, Illinois division, to dismiss the Illinois State Rifle Association and Mary Shepard case. Lisa Madigan is saying that since Illinois has passed a concealed carry law, the case is moot and should be dismissed.



On Wednesday, July 10, attorneys for the Illinois State Rifle Association and Mary Shepard filed a motion requesting a permanent injunction against the State of Illinois because even though the concealed carry bill has passed, people are still not allowed the right to carry and won't be for at least another 270 days. In short, our civil rights are still being violated even though the concealed carry bill has passed. Furthermore, because neither the federal court decision nor the new Carry Act have repealed the AUUW and UUW statutes, law enforcement will continue to enforce both statutes unless a citizen has a valid carry license. We have asked for immediate relief by Tuesday, July 16, 2013. We are asking that citizens with FOID cards be allowed to carry in compliance with provisions in HB0183. We will keep you informed with the court's decision.



This will be a long, protracted fight and your donation will be greatly appreciated.



Thank you for being a member.



Richard A Pearson

Executive Director


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2013 - 04:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/15/is-it-f air-that-a-florida-mom-received-a-20-year-sentence -for-firing-warning-shot/

This reinforces the idea that 3 warning shots should be fired. 2 to center of mass, 1 to the head. Then reevaluate the situation for threats.

State Attorney Angela Corey? That explains a lot.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2013 - 05:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm not sure stand your ground applies when you leave, go get your gun, and come back.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Tuesday, July 16, 2013 - 11:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I agree, but I didn't get the details on the confrontation.

When "estranged" couples with restraining orders come together...... it's not a good thing.

There ARE circumstances that would completely justify going out to the car coming back inside and shooting your ex in the head. They are, unfortunately, fairly common, and I don't know if they apply here. Shooting the ceiling, shooting through doors, ( as prescribed by the Vice President ) or shooting into the air, have their place too, but IMHO that's actually rarer. In fact really damn rare. Almost never.

Since the Persecutor is now known as a criminal, anti-constitutional evil person who wants to disarm you, I thought this interesting.

20 freaking years? This is insanity. She's charged with a felony, and then double charged with a "screw you" that is actually included in the felony....Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon.

This lady got screwed. The Persecutor is ( words I won't type in a family forum ) and probably insane.

Now I don't know the lady, or her ex. She could easily be a crazy person and the ex should have the restraining order against her. ( just because I'm a Libber doesn't mean I don't know that it's NOT always the male that is the bad guy, that's the "feminazi" types like Hillary that believe all sex is rape, and all men are scum. In Hillary's case, she has some reason )

But this is a case of an anti-gun law that may not be meant to apply in this case, and a case where I may actually agree with some Liberal types that don't like mandatory sentence laws. ( as opposed to the NRA position that criminals that use guns should be put away and citizens, not. Which I normally support )

Often these things have unintended effects, this looks like one of them?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Thursday, July 18, 2013 - 09:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/18/washing ton-state-man-accused-illegally-firing-shotgun-cit es-bidens-advice/

This will ever after be known as The Biden Defense.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Notpurples2
Posted on Thursday, July 18, 2013 - 02:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

interesting video about the Alexander case
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration