G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through December 24, 2012 » Finally: Legal CC in Illinois « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 04:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Finally, the GOOD people in Illinois can conceal carry just like the BAD people already do:


quote:

From the Chicago Sun-Times: http://tinyurl.com/armfjma

Big win for gun-rights groups: Federal appeals court tosses state ban on carrying concealed weapons

By Dave McKinney on December 11, 2012 11:21 AM

SPRINGFIELD - In a huge win for gun-rights groups, a federal appeals court in Chicago Tuesday tossed the state's ban on carrying concealed weapons and gave Illinois' Legislature 180 days to craft a law legalizing concealed carry.

"The debate is over. We won. And there will be a statewide carry law in 2013," said Todd Vandermyde, a lobbyist for the National Rifle Association.

In a split opinion (see below), the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling in two cases downstate that upheld the state's longstanding prohibition against carrying concealed weapons.

Illinois is the only state with an outright prohibition on concealed carry.




I can't imagine this will sit very well with our Pres.

Executive order in 3.....2.....1........
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellinachinashop
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 04:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Love the irony of the story being generated out of "Springfield".
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 05:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

he's all ready sold us out to the UN, the real joke is all of the High and mighty know better for us types discover what the crap means ........

because they will be dealt with first,

I wonder what Al is going to do when his mansion and plane are taken AND he is placed in the grass hut so that more can have too.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 05:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I assume this will make it's way up to the IL Supreme court. Personally, I've never understood how this was supposed to be Constitutional, along with many of the other gun laws that infringe upon a right that "shall not be infringed". We have yet to see how restrictive the CC law will be too.

Still, great news for the last hold out state.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 06:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

More from the link:

quote:

"We are disinclined to engage in another round of historical analysis to determine whether eighteenth-century America understood the Second Amendment to include a right to bear guns outside the home," Judge Richard Posner wrote in the court's majority opinion.

"The Supreme Court has decided that the amendment confers a right to bear arms for self-defense, which is as important outside the home as inside. The theoretical and empirical evidence (which overall is inconclusive) is consistent with concluding that a right to carry firearms in public may promote self-defense," he continued.

"Illinois had to provide us with more than merely a rational basis for believing that its uniquely sweeping ban is justified by an increase in public safety. It has failed to meet this burden," Posner wrote.

"The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Second Amendment therefore compels us to reverse the decisions in the two cases before us and remand them to their respective district courts for the entry of declarations of unconstitutionality and permanent injunctions," he continued.

"Nevertheless we order our mandate stayed for 180 days to allow the Illinois legislature to craft a new gun law that will impose reasonable limitations, consistent with the public safety and the Second Amendment as interpreted in this opinion, on the carrying of guns in public," Posner said.




The SCOTUS decision was only a 5-4 majority; think about the implications of THAT for a second, considering who gets to nominate potential new Supremes for (at least) the next four years...

I wonder how long before we simply shitcan the Constitution and Bill of Rights in favor of something more, um, progressive...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 07:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I wonder how long before we simply shitcan the Constitution and Bill of Rights in favor of something more, um, progressive...

Keep watching it wont be too long Me thinks..

Wreck the currency
Disarm the populace..

}
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

99savage
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 08:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Oh No! - Next thing you know people in Chicago will be killing each other in wholesale lots!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Littlebuggles
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 11:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Good news for the people of IL. Too bad it was such a close contest, it seems to be pretty straight forward when the "right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is stated.

...but in this new age, when a lot depends on just what the meaning of the word "is" is. Well who knows where it will all end up...

Here's a clip from an email I received on this, rational thinking from Judge Posner:

In today’s decision, Judge Richard Posner ruled that Illinois’ ban on carriage is unconstitutional. The Judge went on to say, “One doesn’t have to be a historian to realize that a right to keep and bear arms for personal self-defense in the eighteenth century could not rationally have been limited to the home. . . . Twenty-first century Illinois has no hostile Indians. But a Chicagoan is a good deal more likely to be attacked on a sidewalk than in his apartment on the 35th floor.”
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

F22raptor
Posted on Tuesday, December 11, 2012 - 11:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I want to buy a AR-15 off the grid..The time is near..
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ourdee
Posted on Wednesday, December 12, 2012 - 12:28 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'll believe it when I can carry it loaded "legally". I can transport it in most of Illinois now. But, not loaded or outside of a case. Makes my knife faster for now.



Don't worry mates, I'll replace the camo with civy looking clothes for public carry of fire arms.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kenm123t
Posted on Wednesday, December 12, 2012 - 07:56 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

On a side walk you ll stand out like the Jolly Green Giant in your Camo dirty grey and white work best
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ourdee
Posted on Thursday, December 13, 2012 - 07:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Best non threatening urban camo I've found is, kakis, penny loafers, and polo shirts in earth tones.

Back to the Illinois systems. I bought to new boats in June of this year. I went to title and register them a day later. Two months ago I received a title and registration for one of the boats. I applied for both boats at the same time. Today a title for the second craft arrived in the mail. I'm still waiting for the registration for it. How fast is this permit process going to be? Welcome to Illinois.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob_thompson
Posted on Thursday, December 13, 2012 - 10:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

If I remember, been 20 years since I applied for mine, you have to have the application signed off by your county sheriff. Good luck on that one, especially if your in Cook county. Maybe DuPage or Lake county and many downstate. Two of my old Chicago friends have had CC permits from Florida, while they lived in Cook county, for traveling purposes, for some time and now live out of state. Pretty easy to get one from there. I also doubt if Illinois would recognize it. Also glad to see the last holdout state has come on board.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Thursday, December 13, 2012 - 10:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

They aren't on board yet. Look at the new restrictive ordinances the Chicago city council passed right after the Supreme Court decision against the old law.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, December 13, 2012 - 12:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Two of my old Chicago friends have had CC permits from Florida, while they lived in Cook county, for traveling purposes, for some time and now live out of state. Pretty easy to get one from there. I also doubt if Illinois would recognize it.

Up to this point, IL would not recognize a permit from another state. I will be interesting to see what they do in the future. I still expect some of the most restrictive laws of all 50 states. Chicago politicians just don't like armed citizens, except for their own bodyguards of course.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cyclonedon
Posted on Thursday, December 13, 2012 - 10:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm not to excited to see more idiots out on the streets carrying guns, there is already too many shootings taking place now.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Darth_villar
Posted on Friday, December 14, 2012 - 01:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yes, idiots are generally the type that go to a CCW class. Also, the CCW people are always involved in murders/shootings.

Right.

Facts be damned.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Friday, December 14, 2012 - 08:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Just in case you aren't trolling Dan, you ought to go take a CCW class. Here in Ohio you can find them for $75, either a long Saturday or a couple of half day weekends. Regardless of if you are pro or anti second amendment, the information will be valuable to you.

I enjoyed the class, not so much for the content (most of which I knew as well as the instructor already), but more for people watching the others in the class. It had it's share of rednecks (and I use that term with great respect for hard working rural people who live in my area), but it also had urban youths, housewives, and a smattering of fat cubicle farmed pasty white professionals such as myself.

All got along really well, all were polite, and enjoyed spending the day with each other. Guns (some very valuable) were passed around freely between students during the range time for everyone to try, and those with more experience were helpful to those with less.

If you are trolling, well, I guess if you find trolling entertaining, that's your business. Just know statements such as you made just make somebody sound like an uninformed bigot (where I would define bigot as somebody with a high degree of both intolerance and ignorance about a particular demographic or belief system).

Look at the percentage of violent crime committed by CCW holders, and compare it to other demographics. While correlations do not demonstrate causation, the data shows that CCW holders are currently an extraordinarily safe group of people to be around.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

D_adams
Posted on Friday, December 14, 2012 - 08:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

CCW holders are currently an extraordinarily safe group of people to be around.




And most of us try to pass that mindset along to others as well. I haven't gotten my wife totally on board with guns as of yet, but she's a lot farther along than she was at the beginning of this year. She's gone shooting with the kids and I, she's agreed to go to the range with me for some one-on-one training and maybe even a ladies night with her sister at the local range. I doubt I'll ever get her to the point of having a CCW for herself, but at least she knows how to handle a gun now.

I'm still in the "buy more guns" stage, so eventually everyone in the house will have at least one, then stock the vehicles with lock boxes and something to go in them.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tootal
Posted on Friday, December 14, 2012 - 03:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

All got along really well, all were polite, and enjoyed spending the day with each other.

An armed society is a polite society!

Anybody in Illinois please ask your congressman and senator to support HB148 with no changes. This is supported by the Illinois State Rifle Association.

They are afraid that Madigan will support right to carry along with an "assault weapons ban" along with huge fees and more red tape.

« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration