| Author | Message | ||
     Danger_dave |
What a fizzer. Instead of one team elected champeen by a committee - it's four. I don't have a big interest in it - but it feels like a rip to me. They could have really fixed it. Non? | ||
| Wolfridgerider |
it sucks... but the door is creeping open. 8 would be nice... 16 would be great! I'm looking forward to seeing how the "Urban"nation does this year. With no bowl game to go to, I hope we see a bunch of trick plays and a lot of go for it on 4th down | ||
| Danger_dave |
Each conference winner would do it? | ||
| Trojan |
I'm looking forward to seeing how the "Urban"nation does this year. With no bowl game to go to, I hope we see a bunch of trick plays and a lot of go for it on 4th down And I mistakingly thought that Britain and America shared a common language  This might as well be written in Sanskrit for all the sense it makes over here (but then I suppose the 'offside rule' in 'soccer' of the rules of cricket would sound a bit strange to you  ) | ||
| Danger_dave |
I understand both. :-) | ||
| Trojan |
I understand both. :-) You'll have to explain cricket to me sometime then, because it makes no sense to me and I've played it! Well, when I say played......I really mean dozed for a couple of hours on the boundary pretending to field | ||
| Danger_dave |
Yes Mr Trojan - tune in to Sky Sports now. I have just been reliably informed by Michael Atherton in the commentary box at Lords for Eng V Aus that ' the job of the bowler is to get wickets'. At least 5 minutes on this stunning revelation. Well. I. Never. |
