G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through July 04, 2012 » 113ci? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hybridmomentspass
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 09:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I was just browsing ebay and came across this buell

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1997-Custom-Pro-Street-Cho pper-Bobber-Buell-Tube-Frame-Cyclone-/180908391482 ?pt=Motorcycles_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2a1efaf c3a&vxp=mtr

Im not an engine builder, but know some of you gentlemen are educated on this matter.
This guy is saying its 113CuInch motor, stock bored 30over.
Stock is 74ci, thats quite a leap in displacement, is this possible?

Not looking to buy, was just curious if the seller was full of BS or what.
I mean, yes, definitely full of BS on the 'superb handling'....I have a tube frame that is set up, chassis, identical (6over arm, strutted, put a strap on the front end lowering it, my dragbike aint much of a handler)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Natexlh1000
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 09:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

LOL at "superb handling" nice rear shock there.

I wonder how much it's actually stroked?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Natexlh1000
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 09:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I was curious. If S&S were to sell a thing like that, surely they would advertise it!
http://www.sscycle.com/product/Sportster/Engine-Ki ts-c31/

I see no 113 option.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hybridmomentspass
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 09:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

looked, there are two posts right on top of each other - same bike, same info....except the 113ci part isnt on the second one.

Like i said, my track bike is strutted, lowered, and stretched: dont handle worth a lick and is NOT comfortable on anything besides very smooth ashphault or the dragstrip. Usually the return roads make me feel like a bobblehead and is very painful
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jhuppdog
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 09:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

What is the suspension or lack of suspension on that bike? It looks like it is a threaded rod of some sort. Does that turn the bike into the equivalent of a rigid bike?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hybridmomentspass
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 10:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Jhupp - yep. Its a strut, put that in and the swingarm doesnt move
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jhuppdog
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 10:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Would you typically only do this on a drag bike? Or is another reason that you would do this?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hybridmomentspass
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 10:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

on a dragbike it is beneficial (unless you have the coin to spend on finding the right combination for rear suspension), you want the chassis stiff, not flexing. At least on a bar bike (what I have, wheeliebars).

On a street bike, the only reason that I could see would be to lower the bike, as I dont know/think it'd be possible to lower a tubeframe any other way.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

99buellx1
Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 - 11:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

There were lowering links available at one point for tuners, changed the front mount I believe.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fast1075
Posted on Thursday, June 21, 2012 - 05:40 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

That thing would certainly beat your eyes out on the street and be seriously dangerous in a bumpy corner.

Actually there were three Pro Stock teams in the late 80's that experimented with rear 4 link suspension AND wheelie bars.

Obviously it didn't work out, but some good minds tried it...think Gast, Bryce and Hines.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration