G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through April 29, 2012 » Private Launch to Space Station? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregtonn
Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2012 - 10:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

So far this has flown pretty much under the radar.
It would be great to see what private enterprise can do in space.

http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/bre83f1bq-us-spac e-dragon/

G
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sparky
Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 - 02:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

This article re: SpaceX appeared in yesterday's Daily Breeze.

It's pretty cool to see a local innovative company like SpaceX making progress in aerospace. Nearly everyday when I pass by their headquarters and the Tesla showroom at the Hawthorne airport I get a sense of pride and hope in what they're doing there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crusty
Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 - 03:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

That's the most hopeful and positive thing I've read in a long time.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mr_grumpy
Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 - 04:31 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yup pretty cool, hope they pull it off.

As a sci-fi reader for well over 40 years now it's long been one of my dreams to go into space.

Thanks Mr Heinlein.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crusty
Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 - 04:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

D.D. Harriman would be proud.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Birdy
Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 - 05:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Glad to see it. While I was sad to see the shuttles go in a way I was glad. My hero were explores NOT grocery delivery boys. I think NASA got side-tracked into shuttle fever after the moon shots not really having a plan.

IF they had had a plan and the funding (there's the rub) 30 years ago we might be on mars by now. There would be without a doubt a moon base.

Let private ships deliver the grub and NASA get back to exploring.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crusty
Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2012 - 07:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

NASA had a good plan for real spacecraft that could fly into space and return, back in the '70s. Senator Proxmire managed to kill most of their funding. The Shuttle was all NASA could afford after their money evaporated.
Now, that jackass in the White House has killed NASAs funding for a manned Mars flight.
History repeats itself.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bandm
Posted on Friday, April 20, 2012 - 11:13 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Sounds like an attempt to duplicate the Boing/Bigelow CST-100 or the Lockheed Martin Orion and a step backwards from the very successful and ongoing X37 program, at several times the cost. What's 3.8 billion among friends? Sounds like a Solyndra to me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregtonn
Posted on Friday, April 20, 2012 - 11:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"...a step backwards from the very successful and ongoing X37 program..."

Well maybe except for this.

"The X-37 was originally designed to be carried into orbit in the Space Shuttle's cargo bay..."

Interesting concept but not the kind of heavy lifter you need to supply the Space Station.

G
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bandm
Posted on Saturday, May 19, 2012 - 10:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


Nice try though.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sparky
Posted on Thursday, May 24, 2012 - 04:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hurray, they did it!!! SpaceX Conquers the Last Frontier

(AP photo)

No, the rocket wasn't launched from the Space Shuttle, but, I guess, the news agency just had to make a point, LOL.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration