| Author | Message | ||
     Reindog |
I forget...is this the thread about vaginas or Sheriff Joe? If the former, count me in! | ||
| Reindog |
Hey Ferris, Al Lighton, Jerry Johnson, Sammy the ex-Marine, yours truly, and a host of other kooks invaded Ocotillo Wells with our dirtbikes this past weekend for the 50th anniversary of the "Tierra Del Sol" jeep event. Didn't think about Obama the Worst all weekend. Pretty refreshing. I don't think you can change anybody's mind. Only experience can. I went from Liberal to a right of center Conservative. All it took was time. | ||
| Fb1 |
OK, just one more:
| ||
| Strokizator |
Didn't think about Obama the Worst all weekend. Pretty refreshing. But you should be worrying about Boxer and Feinstein. They keep chipping away at our access to these fun places. Places they've never been to, only flown over. Check out this website and subscribe to the e-mail notices. http://www.arra-access.com I've written to both senators and at least Feinstein has replied. Boxer couldn't care less what I think. | ||
| Drkside79 |
Ok which one of you is this? Come on fess up... It was on the internet it must be true...  | ||
| Fb1 |
Hey Ferris... You guys "occupied" Ocotillo Wells, home of the Buelling Man, without me?!?  Hey, whatcha make of this:
Mr. Obama, um, certainly flopped his position about the propriety of lobbyists in the White House. My questions are: - Why? - Why now? - What has changed that would cause him to bring in such a huge hired-gun at this stage of the run-up to the election, knowing that he's on record as being against lobbyists in the White House? FB | ||
| Fb1 |
At 9:30 into his speech at the Jefferson Jackson Fund Raising Dinner, Des Moines, Iowa, November 10th, 2007 (emphasis mine):
| ||
| Blake |
Obama admin has lobbyists all over the place. The man lacks integrity; he's a pathological liar, so this is just another case of him breaking his word, just par for his course for him. | ||
| Fb1 |
The man lacks integrity; he's a pathological liar, so this is just another case of him breaking his word, just par for his course for him. You know that. I know that. Our job is to open the eyes of the folks who DON'T know that. We're not just singing to the choir here. Folks who voted for Mr. Obama follow these threads. They may not post, but they're following along. Our job is to pull back the blinds, to cause an "Aha!" moment here and there. November is bearing down on us like a fast freight, and we need every single vote we can get. I spent a fair amount of time putting his lobbyist quotes and the YouTube clip together. It's not for me, and it's not for you. It's for people who think we're making all this stuff up. It's to open some eyes, amigo. | ||
| Dfishman |
Thanks FB.You are doing a great job.I hope some eyes are opened.I am worried.If our elected officials just followed the constitution I would not fret,but it seems new rules are written as (the Obama administration)they see fit.No matter if they violate our constitution or not. | ||
| Julie |
I'm registered unaffiliated/independent. I have voted for both Republicans and Democrats in the past. I voted for President Obama in 2008, and while I may not agree with everything he's done, there's no way I would vote for any of the clowns the Republicans have put forward so far. The 2012 GOP primaries have been an embarrassment to our nation. | ||
| Ulyranger |
"Posted on Tuesday, March 06, 2012 - 10:12 am: Ulyranger - They did account for the frame work of a working government that empowered the people I agree mostly with your words and fully with your sentiment, but my take is that the Constitution belongs to the sovereign, i.e. the people. WE own the Constitution, and WE decide what is constitutional. Our government, as created by the Founders, are agents of the sovereign. We empower THEM, not the other way around. I think we're saying the same thing. Take care, FB" We are thinking along parallel tracks. The Constitution does belong to us, but we the People do not rule on constitutionality. That would be the Court(s) of Appeal up to and including the Supreme Court. Democracy vs republic. Never said the government empowered We the People, but do believe the founding documents do. We in turn empower the government through our will or indifference, or a bit of both. I think we're in the same room. | ||
| Ulyranger |
I'm am far from exited about the candidates put forth to oppose BO........but if they are "clowns" what exactly does that make BO and Joe "six-pack" Biden??? | ||
| Fb1 |
Hi Julie, thanks for joining the fray. A couple of questions if I may? - Can I assume from your statement above that you're going to vote for Mr. Obama again? If so, I'd be interested in hearing your reasons why he has earned your vote again. - You called the Republican candidates "clowns" and the GOP primaries an "embarrassment to our nation." Can you be more specific on both of these points? Thank you. FB | ||
| Fb1 |
Ulyranger -
Agree. Best, FB | ||
| Julie |
- President Obama has my vote because he is not one of the clowns in the GOP primaries. - Watch any of the GOP 2012 primary debates and you will see how embarrassing these people are. The only one that I could possibly support would be Dr. Ron Paul, but there's no way he'll get the Republican nomination. | ||
| Fb1 |
I'm also a fan of Ron Paul. He'd be a great president and defender of the Constitution, of that I have no doubt.
That's an interesting endorsement. With all due respect, is that all you've got? | ||
| Court |
Julie: I know how you feel. I spent 2 hours with Eric Holder the other day. The guy is ill educated, untruthful (his bold face lies before Congress are nearly comical) and it became clear to me that he's out of touch with realty and the law. As he spoke, he made it clear that every problem this administration has had has been someone else's fault. Absolutely no integrity or responsibly. I assume you think Holder a clown as well. | ||
| Blake |
Julie, Nothing about Obama's history or policies that bother you? | ||
| Xdigitalx |
I can't wait to get my Black Anti-Obama Magic Marker. It is for placing an X over the Obama/Pepsi logo. (actually any marker will do) I wonder if Pepsi will change their logo after O is gone? I am also tired of seeing just one candidate in Google ads. Can't wait till the real campaign starts, gonna be a bashfest. Gonna love when I see the left tv news goobers cringe when Obama looses. | ||
| Drkside79 |
Gonna love when I see the left tv news goobers cringe when Obama looses. Hmmm Last i saw the betting line on it Obama was -125 cant remember last time they were wrong. | ||
| Drkside79 |
Crap i was wrong it has As of 3/1 Barack Obama: -220 - Odds On Favorite Mitt Romney: +250 Rick Santorum: +1200 Newt Gingrich: +4000 Ron Paul: +5000 Hillary Clinton: +10000 | ||
| Drkside79 |
Oh and dig heres one for you...  | ||
| Xdigitalx |
Butt ugly. Missing the X. Those stats are about as useful as the boogers in my nose. | ||
| 2734 |
Drkside79 wrote : Ok which one of you is this? Come on fess up... It was on the internet it must be true... I darn sure aint me. I wouldnt be caught dead with that rifle stock on my M1A. The stock set on my Israeli SWS is bad enough ! | ||
| Drkside79 |
Those stats are about as useful as the boogers in my nose. Odd you would say that if you consider betting lines are very rarely wrong. Thats not to say the line won't shift it will but Vegas never loses. Oh and as for boogers they are useful unless you want more dirt pollen and bacteria in your lungs. Juist sayin | ||
| Xdigitalx |
if you consider betting lines..... I don't. stats/poles that will change as many times as I wipe my ass between now and election day = Boogers. Oh and as for boogers they are useful unless you want more dirt pollen and bacteria in your lungs. I prefer snot any day. | ||
| Xdigitalx |
Dig this:  | ||
| Sifo |
 | ||
| Admin |
Polls or odds prior to the general campaign are near worthless. Blake |
