G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through June 23, 2011 » E-B-R and 1190RS Coverage at Visor Down « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through June 16, 2011M2nc30 06-16-11  09:51 pm
         

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pkforbes87
Posted on Thursday, June 16, 2011 - 10:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Rule 34.. hah.

Unfortunately, it is mostly true.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregtonn
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 12:13 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"...the ZTL system does away with that torsional load on the front wheel, and the spokes only need to support the weight of the bike and forward g forces when braking..."

True, and the rear spokes have to transfer lots of power, i.e. torque to the rear rim/tire from the sprocket/center hub. Thus the difference.

G
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregtonn
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 12:20 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Oh, and the front wheel needs to withstand the side loads of cornering, thus the triangulation which is not apparent from a straight on side view.

G
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Swampdog225
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 12:53 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It keeps getting better!!!!!
http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/firstrides/122_1 109_2012_erik_buell_racing_1190rs/index.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Midknyte
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 12:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

i have now just pin pointed what the 1190 looks like from the front. im not going to come out and say it but just think lower part of a female

I'm not seeing it...




Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pepperk496
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 01:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

From the motorcyclist link -

The superlight machine feels preternaturally fast, accelerating with an urgency that surpasses even BMW's overdog S1000RR.

Read more: http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/firstrides/122_1 109_2012_erik_buell_racing_1190rs/index.html#ixzz1 PVT5ZSa3
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gregtonn
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 01:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"...from the sprocket/center hub..."

All-new "hubless" cast-magnesium wheels-the latest example of Buell's typically radical innovation-

Obviously he is well ahead of me, (and the rest of the motorcycle world).

G
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Littlebuggles
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 04:42 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

In the body of the article they write that the bike has a claimed BHP of 160, while the spec sheet in the article matches the E.B.R. spec sheet which shows a BHP of 175.

What's up with that?

I think that they gave it five of five stars and didn't knock the bike at all is awesome (except the criticism of total stopping power).

Well done article regarding the bike. Well done bike Mr. Buell!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hughlysses
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 05:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The article says 160 rear wheel horse power; the 175 HP rating is at the crankshaft.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wolfridgerider
Posted on Friday, June 17, 2011 - 08:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


"I've taken a lot of blame over the years for Buell motorcycles, often for decisions that had nothing to do with me," he says. "Not this time. This is exactly what I wanted to build!"
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration