Author |
Message |
Buellerandy
| Posted on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 01:53 pm: |
|
http://www.cnn.com/ |
Wolfridgerider
| Posted on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 02:11 pm: |
|
Its CNN... what did you expect? besides the 43% no voters would slaughter the 57% yes voters in a gun fight... Gun control... being able the hit you target |
Sifo
| Posted on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 02:17 pm: |
|
besides the 43% no voters would slaughter the 57% yes voters in a gun fight... Especially considering the extra time they will have to spend reloading after every 10th round! |
Buellerandy
| Posted on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 02:18 pm: |
|
I've always preferred "Gun control: using both hands" |
Cityxslicker
| Posted on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 02:23 pm: |
|
45 apc because shooting a target twice indeed redundant |
Sub65chris
| Posted on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 03:22 pm: |
|
they are just looking for a story. or rather they have the story and are just looking for the "facts" they need to fill it out. when the brady bill went through the general gun enthusiast community was not well organized on any level really, other than the national level. now things are getting better every year as far as information and manpower to make changes or block changes. dont think to much of what tehy are doing they did similar things about two years ago . |
Thumper74
| Posted on Saturday, April 21, 2012 - 12:17 am: |
|
I still don't get the high cap mag thing anyway... It did nothing for the original AWB, it won't do anything now. They don't understand that criminals aren't concerned with them banning high cap mags... |
Aesquire
| Posted on Tuesday, September 18, 2012 - 01:02 pm: |
|
http://www.baen.com/GettingGunsRight.asp |