G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » States Say Union Vote Private! Feds Say NO! Must Allow Card-Check! « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through January 16, 2011Kc10_fe30 01-16-11  05:33 pm
         

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellkowski
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 05:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

To create a union, who would organize, oversee, and certify such a secret ballot to all parties' satisfaction? The company? The proposed union organizers?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 05:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The secret ballot system seems to be working just fine as it is, or are you saying that there is currently no voting process to unionize a company?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dalton_gang
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 06:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"To create a union, who would organize, oversee, and certify such a secret ballot to all parties' satisfaction? The company? The proposed union organizers?"


The NLRB
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 06:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The "Civil" bunch would prefer the Politboro to oversee the "open" union elections.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellkowski
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 06:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

As I understand it, under current practice, the first step to union formation is the card check. If the employer voluntarily accepts the card check results then the union is formed. If they do not accept the card check results, then the NLRB oversees a secret ballot that binds the employer to the results.

The new proposed federal legislation does away with the second, secret ballot step, hence businesses opposition to it.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellkowski
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 06:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The NLRB exists as a mediator between labor and business. By putting them in charge of overseeing a secret ballot on union creation (and preventing them from divulging any info to the company about such a ballot), you put the NLRB at odds with business.

The card check is like a declaration of independence. The NLRB doesn't initiate the card check, they just validate it and certify the new union, all without taking sides in the situation.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 09:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

If this is the normal process, it would appear that the NLRB is acting like the UN in overseeing the election and making sure that all is on the up and up. Card Check, in and of itself is more susceptible to tampering.

The formal vote with the NRLB's oversight would at least provide SOME oversight to the process and some guarantees that voter intimidation was at least minimized.

Many would vote yes for card check and no for official balloting particularly if there were concerns that their vote might be held against them.

My guess is that many Card Check votes resulted in union defeat once the official ballots were cast.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 10:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Actually . . a good deal of the foregoing is inaccurate.

The FIRST step, of course, is the Form 502 . . the petition. This is the first step in both Certifying a union and De-certifying a union. Be mindful workers have the unfettered right to do both.

Take a look at the form HERE

The heart of the matter, pretty much the "belong or not belong" that we are discussing . . has it's genesis in the early paragraphs of The Act:


quote:

RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES



Sec. 7. [§ 157.] Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and shall also have the right to refrain from any or all such activities except to the extent that such right may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment as authorized in section 8(a)(3) [section 158(a)(3) of this title].




Most folks miss the portion that the NLRA not only asserts the right to choose to organize. . . it, quite vocally, asserts the right to NOT organize. Read it carefully.

Fun stuff . . . I haven't studied it since 1977 and at that time I was really into the thick of Labor Law and Legislation. It's a very interesting topic and it has a fascinating history.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellkowski
Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 - 10:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

From the petition instructions:

The filing of a petition seeking certification or decertification of a union
should be accompanied by a sufficient showing of interest to support such a
petition—i.e., a showing that 30% or more of the employees in the bargaining
unit seek to be represented by the union or seek to decertify the currently
recognized union. If the original showing is not sent to the Region with the
filing of the petition, a party must deliver the original showing of interest to
the Region within 48 hours after the filing of the petition, but in no event later
than the last day on which a petition may be timely filed.


This is the card check, no? It must accompany the petition.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration