Author |
Message |
Kyrocket
| Posted on Thursday, October 28, 2010 - 09:50 am: |
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101027/od_y blog_upshot/very-early-photographic-images-of-huma ns-discovered I found the article very interesting not only from a photographic point of view but also historically. Click on the NPR link at the end of the article to see more. What fascinates me is not only the fact that technology has come so far but what many of us take for granted about everyday life. 162 years is a long, long time but in the grand scheme of things it's just a vapor. Imagine if you could talk to the fellas that took this picture and show them what we have available today. I bet almost everyone reading this has a camera in their pocket. Maybe I'm just waxing sentimental, I lost my grandmother nine years ago yesterday and have been re-prioritizing things but that is one damn neat picture. 162 years and most, if any, of those people didn't even know their picture was taken. |
Danger_dave
| Posted on Thursday, October 28, 2010 - 03:16 pm: |
|
'My idea of a good photograph is one that is in focus and has a famous person in it' - A Warhol. My idea of a good photograph is one that is in focus and has boobies in it. - DD |
Danger_dave
| Posted on Thursday, October 28, 2010 - 04:21 pm: |
|
Just been looking at it in detail. 10 minute exposure. My kind of equipment! |
Mnrider
| Posted on Thursday, October 28, 2010 - 04:32 pm: |
|
You and Andy are both right Dave! |
Big_red_79
| Posted on Thursday, October 28, 2010 - 09:15 pm: |
|
two birds with one stone! a famous set of boobs in focus would work! |
Kyrocket
| Posted on Friday, October 29, 2010 - 09:15 am: |
|
What I found interesting as I was reading some of the comments in the NPR section was that; by using a silver plate the pixel size is one atom thereby making the resolution so good that 162 years later we could zoom in on the detail. I also agree with the previous comments. |
|