Author |
Message |
Froggy
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 04:27 pm: |
|
I wonder if they would make a single to throw in the Blast? http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/ |
Kustomklassix
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 04:49 pm: |
|
A 7850 HP Blast...SIGN ME UP!!!! Link to the ship for this big-azz engine - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_M%C3%A6rsk
|
Dalton_gang
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:02 pm: |
|
Wow! That kinda doesn't look real. I wonder how much horse power it takes to crank it over? |
Kustomklassix
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:17 pm: |
|
They get half the crew to jump on a platform attatched to the flywheel to get it slowly spinning to the point where the 1100hp starter motor can kick in |
Captcaz
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:35 pm: |
|
I'm almost jealous ... my last ship was a petite 750 feet long and weighed in at just under 50,000 tons ... 105,000 HP thru 4 gas turbines ... respectable. http://www.msc.navy.mil/inventory/ships.asp?ship=7 On a smaller one now ... bringing up the rear with only 4,200HP. |
Dentguy
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:45 pm: |
|
It's not that big. Those people are really small. |
Cityxslicker
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 06:50 pm: |
|
the oompa loompas are working on the head rebuild for your old audi in line |
Jramsey
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 06:53 pm: |
|
60 HP electric motor with gear reduction in the lower left is used to bump the crank over during assy. Anybody notice the steps/rungs in the crankcase throws,IIRC it was said the rod and main bearing inserts weigh over 80 lbs. apiece. Somewhere on the net there is a picture of the planner/shaper and horizontal/ vertical boring mill that was used to align bore and machine the the lower crankcase half. Oh, and someone needs to find a pic of the lathe that was used to turn the crank its quite a piece of machinery itself. |
Court
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 07:20 pm: |
|
Cornering is going to be a problem. That is VERY cool. |
Eboos
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 07:23 pm: |
|
It needs some lightening to help it spin up faster. |
Speedfreaks101
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 07:38 pm: |
|
Just imagine what would happen if you hit it with too much nitrous and it kicked out a rod!? |
J2blue
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 09:46 pm: |
|
God I love these images. You know, I tried to make the point to the DMG/Buell naysayers who were so obsessed with displacement. Given a similar two mile course I think it would be fair to have one of these huge displacement ships racing against a 600cc rice burner. AND, there is a clear horsepower advantage to these giants. But... Yep, Court, cornering and braking are the weak point. |
Oldog
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 10:13 pm: |
|
The guy in the green shirt see him? the caption is "Oh $hit! I dropped my pen" "I wonder if any one will notice if I just leave it" |
Danger_dave
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 11:58 pm: |
|
I stowed away om a Freighter a few times. Me, her and an XS1100. |
Danger_dave
| Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 11:59 pm: |
|
Ohmmmmm. |
Boltrider
| Posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 - 12:46 am: |
|
5.6 million ft/lbs of torque should be enough. Imagine how loud that sucker could be during testing. |
Big_b
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 11:48 am: |
|
Here are some more pics. I work on a smaller version of this engine in the natural gas industry. http://www.handpickedtrucks.com/wartsilla-ship-eng ine.html |
Ferris_von_bueller
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 12:18 pm: |
|
100rpm |
Big_b
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 01:46 pm: |
|
That's fast when you imagine all of that weight turning 360º in under a second. My Wartsila turns 800rpm. |
Chadhargis
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 01:53 pm: |
|
And someone, somewhere, is worried about whether they should use synthetic or dino oil and how they can save $3 on an oil filter. LOL! |
Big_b
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 04:02 pm: |
|
And buckets of loctite |
Edgydrifter
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 06:31 pm: |
|
So, it uses manhole covers for valve shims? |
Froggy
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 06:52 pm: |
|
I don't see any valves, looks like a 2 smoke. |
Gearhead571
| Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 08:29 pm: |
|
Two stroke diesels generally have poppet valves in the head. Usually four of them. They use a blower to provide air for scavenging and combustion. Your weed wacker uses the pressure created from the down stroke of the piston to force the intake air and fuel mix into the cylinder for combustion. Yes it is a two stroke. |
Firebolt020283
| Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 - 08:39 am: |
|
When I was stationed in south Korea I got to go on a tour of the hyundai factories, well i learned they do not just build cars they also build ships and they had engines that big and it was really neat to see engine blocks so big that you could get into one of the cylinders and probably walk around on top of a piston(they did not let us do this of course) |