Author |
Message |
Dago
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 08:57 am: |
|
The owner of a local (road-racing oriented) bike shop suggested I bring my new bike in to him so he can break in the motor and gear-box according the SAE specifications. He claims to have personally seen 5-7% more rwhp along with longer engine life on motors that have been broken in the SAE way over on the street. ??? |
Cataract2
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 09:43 am: |
|
I smell bs from him. |
Bomber
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 09:55 am: |
|
I'd be interested in seeing what is claimed to be the SAE breakin procedure -- seems I've read more the 5 or 6 different procedures from different manufacturers -- this does leave a bit of an aroma, don't it? |
Voltage_vector
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 07:38 pm: |
|
I'd like to see the written 'SAE procedure' on this one...see if he'll get you a copy to post! |
Interex2050
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 09:58 pm: |
|
I still believe that strictly following the manufacturer's break-in procedure is the best idea. After all (at least in most cases) they did design and build the engine... |
Swampy
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 10:19 pm: |
|
This way makes the most sense to me. I used to work at a racing shop and by the time the motor came off the dyno stand......it was broken in. http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm |
Spiderman
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 10:36 pm: |
|
SAE + Stupid And Entertaining. IE. Throw on a dyno, pop into 3rd gear and run it off the limiter till cherry |
Cataract2
| Posted on Monday, February 27, 2006 - 11:40 pm: |
|
As for Motoman, I think he's full of it also. I'll take the manufacture's guidelines for break in over his any day. |
Bomber
| Posted on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 - 09:12 am: |
|
I'll use motoman's procedure the instant he starts covering the warranty ;-} |