| Author | Message | ||
     Xoptimizedrsx |
the mlv is not working correct on the correction weights. this is 100% verified. also the lc1 default are not correct. phil tomland the mlv creator is being contacted for the corrections. everyone using mlv that has purchased it will be getting a update soon. others will need to search updates over the next couple weeks. these test were conclusive and accurate. its a minor adjustment which is in the mlv. Innovate the LC1 company have been helping find the errors. There engineers and staff have been very help full. thanks Klause and Scott everything is figured out on whats happening now its just time till we get change to the multipliers and weights. then tuning will be more accurate and faster getting the results you like. this data will be worked out between the Innovate corp and MLV. I just help track and test. I hope this was use full to anyone tuning with MLV only. mike | ||
| Hogs |
Mike for what its worth... I have heard more than once and on other forums( bikes and Autos ) that alot were having some sort of problems with the LC-1`s and they were not Happy Campers, No Problems while using the LM1`s.... | ||
| Moosestang |
So is it correcting to rich or to lean or both? | ||
| Xoptimizedrsx |
I'M WORKING DIRECTLY WITH THE INNOVATE COMPANY ON THIS. THEY ASSURE IT NOT THE SENSOR OR THE LOG WORKS 3 PROGRAM LM1 AND LC1 BOTH USE THE SAME SOFTWARE. THEY ARE SEARCHING DONE THE PROBLEM IN THE MLV SCALE. WHEN YOU MANUALLY CHANGE THE DATA ITS FEEDING PERFECT. BUT IF YOU RUN MLV IT WILL OVER SHOOT THE BOUNDRIES. THEY WILL FIGURE IT OUT AND IT WILL BE BACK BETTER THAN EVER. TILL THEN MANUALLY TUNE EACH CELL AFTER MLV GETS IT CLOSE. ITS STILL BETTER THAN STOCK. MIKE | ||
| Xoptimizedrsx |
MOOSE ITS DOING BOTH. |
