G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Motorcycle Forum » XBoard » Buell XBoard Archives » Archive through September 24, 2006 » XB12R weighing in « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

T9r
Posted on Monday, September 18, 2006 - 04:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

2004 XB12R weighing in.

I took the bike over to the scale today. With a full tank of fuel and other fluids and the scale reading in increments of 10 lbs.

Front: 240 lbs (front tire only on the scale)
Rear: 220 lbs (rear tire only on the scale)

Total weight: 460 lbs (whole bike only on the scale)

There were 3 seperate weighings to confirm numbers, no math done to get any other number.

(Message edited by t9r on September 18, 2006)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Monday, September 18, 2006 - 04:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

It doesn't "quite" work like that I don't think... I think it'll be a bit less than that if the whole bike was on the scale...

I'm not certain though.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bdabuell
Posted on Monday, September 18, 2006 - 05:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

i'd agree...using that method there wouldn't be any way to isolate "front" weight from "rear" weight.
Everything off the scale out as far as your pivot point (I'm assuming the wheel not on the scale) is going to contribute to some extent...so when you switch wheels it will contribute again and you'll have some overlap...how much I don't know
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Microchop
Posted on Monday, September 18, 2006 - 05:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

As long as the bike is level both times it shouldn't matter.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sleez
Posted on Monday, September 18, 2006 - 06:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

with ten pound increments, a few degrees in level won't matter much, as evidence by the updated post!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

T9r
Posted on Monday, September 18, 2006 - 06:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Rolled the bike up to the scale. Yes, it was level.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Holling
Posted on Monday, September 18, 2006 - 07:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Most magazines put the XBs wet weight in that area, so that sounds accurate.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lenb
Posted on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 - 02:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Interesting that there is more weight over the front wheel (52% vs 48%). Possiblly a reason why the XB is stable despite the short wheelbase and radical geometry. Anyone know what the weight distribution is on an average Japanese sportbike?
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration