Author |
Message |
Duggram
| Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 07:51 am: |
|
Dris, in a different thread you made a comment about a comparison between the race exhaust from EBR and the Torque Hammer. I'd like to hear more about that. So I'm starting this thread so we wouldn't jack the other. So how do they compare? Do the larger header pipes make that much difference on the race pipe? Are they nearly equal in low RPM performance? For me this is important because I race and still have the stock rod/crank in my bike which I understand is a problem at greater than 10,500 RPM. More horsepower is really cool, but reliability and drive-ability are more important to me at this time. Your comments would be appreciated. |
Easyrider
| Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 08:22 am: |
|
Duggram, My friend, where did you read that???????????????????????? When I was talking about this, it's about the ECM product I don't have the EBR exhaust tested... It is way too loud for European race circuits. I don't think i will ever test one, unless EBR sends me one for free.. (Message edited by easyrider on February 09, 2010) (Message edited by easyrider on February 09, 2010) |
Duggram
| Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 08:30 am: |
|
My apologies!! I misunderstood what you said in the "...My SOTP Impressions" thread. |
Easyrider
| Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 08:45 am: |
|
But oke, Here is my experience with the TORQUE HAMMER and the EBR Race ECM: 144.8 HP and 117 NM of Torque (84,05 lb-ft)
|
Duggram
| Posted on Tuesday, February 09, 2010 - 09:47 am: |
|
How can I get this map? The one I have now is the one you sent me a year ago. I think back then it was producing 141 on your dyno. If I can pick up 3 RWHP just by downloading a new map to my ECM, I want to do that. |
|