Author |
Message |
D_adams
| Posted on Friday, September 18, 2009 - 09:34 pm: |
|
Just curious what everyone else is getting on theirs, stock, modified (what was done to get there for hardware) and tuned. I just had mine dyno'd today. 128 rwhp!!!! Essentially stock, just a K&N filter right now. I had a Jardine CF on it for a while, took that off and will be building my own very soon, just need to order stainless tubing now. Anyways, I just bought a Miller 150 tig welder just for this project. I'm pretty sure I lost a little bit up top going back to stock, but I'm happy with the #'s it posted. Unfortunately, the pickup for the coil was broken on the dyno at Gateway H-D, so no torque curve on mine. I'll see if I can get a scan or a pic of the run sheet this weekend. forgot to add, AFV was 110 front and 100 rear, 84 degrees F. (Message edited by d_adams on September 18, 2009) |
Ponti1
| Posted on Friday, September 18, 2009 - 09:43 pm: |
|
I was also at 128.something with stock bike and 05Z flash. was I think at 134 with some added fuel, but was too rich. Haven't had a dyno run lately with the K&N in there, but happy to report the way low AFV numbers I was initially getting with the K&N have gone away. |
Easyrider
| Posted on Friday, September 18, 2009 - 10:29 pm: |
|
stock ecm, tuned, Torque hammer exhaust K&N filter SAE corrected 143.8HP and 112 NM of Torque on the rear wheel and stock compared to tuned:
|
T_man
| Posted on Friday, September 18, 2009 - 11:12 pm: |
|
Easy - not to take away from your impressive Torque Hammer - but back in '08 when you were first dyno tuning the 1125R (as archived on your website) didn't you make pretty much the same numbers (141hp & 113Nm of Tq) with a good fuel map and stock exhaust only? I'm curious to where the advantage of an aftermarket exhuast lies when a good fuel map can provide such a significant gain. Perhaps the aftermarket exhaust allows the engine to rev quicker? Maybe more midrange? I'd love to see an overlay comparison between two of your dyno charts; 1) Good fuel map with stock exhaust 2) Good fuel map with Torque Hammer exhaust Again, I know you guys have worked hard on tuning the 1125R and my questions are out of pure curiosity not posed in any way to discredit your exhaust products. Thanks! |
Easyrider
| Posted on Saturday, September 19, 2009 - 12:05 am: |
|
T-Man, It's all about low end torque, in this setup look at the dyno ABOVE (red Line) the low end torque combined with our fuelmap makes you wanne drive at low speeds. It is really strong bottom line much stronger then any aftermarket exhaust. Top end power is good compared to stock exhaust. Look at the graph below 4 different exhaust manufacturers, the blue line is Torque hammer, same bike, same ECM. (Message edited by easyrider on September 19, 2009) |
Blake
| Posted on Saturday, September 19, 2009 - 01:14 am: |
|
Nice! That blue plot is impressive! 100 RWHP at 6K RPM building to near 120 RWHP at 7K RPM! I like! What else is in that motor? |
Xbswede
| Posted on Saturday, September 19, 2009 - 01:18 am: |
|
Stock Bike with D&D open airbox, K&N and fuel tuning.
|
Easyrider
| Posted on Saturday, September 19, 2009 - 02:25 am: |
|
Blake, bone stock... |
Blake
| Posted on Saturday, September 19, 2009 - 03:50 am: |
|
It will be interesting to see what some good cylinder head work might net. |
Easyrider
| Posted on Saturday, September 19, 2009 - 12:09 pm: |
|
will finish that this winter, we take the engine apart after 1 race season too see what happends inside, and then we tune stage 2 heads, and pistons Maybe bigger bore), and cams. We will sell this as a stage 2 package complete with ECM, plug and play (-; |
Mrbikle
| Posted on Saturday, September 19, 2009 - 01:34 pm: |
|
i did 140rwhp and 80 ft/lbs on tune from 133/72 stock. stock bike otherwise. |
Bcrawf68
| Posted on Monday, September 21, 2009 - 02:26 pm: |
|
Easyrider, I like the numbers, but, looking on Twinmotorcycles web site, it looks like the tune costs around $1000USD. Is that true? Also, everyone, is there a less expensive alternate that makes good power? If so, how much power and how much money? Hope this is ok to ask... |
Clarkjw
| Posted on Monday, September 21, 2009 - 03:04 pm: |
|
Easy, I love your great website and Buell passion. Keep up the good work. Could you put torque into Ft/lbs for the sake of graphs. It will be easier to compare and will look MUCH better. If you give me the data, I'll do it. |
Lovedabueller
| Posted on Monday, September 21, 2009 - 03:09 pm: |
|
OK, i got a question why is everybody so worried about getting more HP with this bike? After i modded the muffler i SERIOUSLY thought about putting it back. cause THIS BIKE IS A FRIGGIN BEAST!!! STOCK!!!!! |
Chevycummins
| Posted on Monday, September 21, 2009 - 03:38 pm: |
|
118hp and 67ft/lbs I rode another 2008 1125R that seems to run much better than mine. Back to the dealer as the bike finally set a low fuel pressure code. |
Littlebutquick
| Posted on Monday, September 21, 2009 - 04:03 pm: |
|
i run my 9.92 et with twinmotorcycle.nl full map that says it all can't wait for the drag torque hammer and map |
Easyrider
| Posted on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 - 05:49 am: |
|
Bcrawf68, we are working on making a cheaper product for everyone. The product you see, is a STOCK ECM and a programmed fuelmap on it complete, plug and play. (Message edited by Easyrider on September 23, 2009) |
|